About 1 out of 150 live newborns has a detectable chromosomal abnormality. Yet even this high incidence represents only a small fraction of chromosome mutations since the vast majority are lethal and result in prenatal death or stillbirth. Indeed, 50 percent of all first-trimester miscarriages and 20 percent of all second-trimester miscarriages are estimated to involve a chromosomally abnormal fetus.
Chromosome disorders can be grouped into three principal categories: (1) those that involve numerical abnormalities of the autosomes, (2) those that involve structural abnormalities of the autosomes, and (3) those that involve the sex chromosomes. Autosomes are the 22 sets of chromosomes found in all normal human cells. They are referred to numerically (e.g., chromosome 1, chromosome 2) according to a traditional sort order based on size, shape, and other properties. Sex chromosomes make up the 23rd pair of chromosomes in all normal human cells and come in two forms, termed X and Y. In humans and many other animals, it is the constitution of sex chromosomes that determines the sex of the individual, such that XX results in a female and XY results in a male.
Numerical abnormalities, involving either the autosomes or sex chromosomes, are believed generally to result from meiotic nondisjunctionthat is, the unequal division of chromosomes between daughter cellsthat can occur during either maternal or paternal gamete formation. Meiotic nondisjunction leads to eggs or sperm with additional or missing chromosomes. Although the biochemical basis of numerical chromosome abnormalities remains unknown, maternal age clearly has an effect, such that older women are at significantly increased risk to conceive and give birth to a chromosomally abnormal child. The risk increases with age in an almost exponential manner, especially after age 35, so that a pregnant woman age 45 or older has between a 1 in 20 and 1 in 50 chance that her child will have trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), while the risk is only 1 in 400 for a 35-year-old woman and less than 1 in 1,000 for a woman under the age of 30. There is no clear effect of paternal age on numerical chromosome abnormalities.
Although Down syndrome is probably the best-known and most commonly observed of the autosomal trisomies, being found in about 1 out of 800 live births, both trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 are also seen in the population, albeit at greatly reduced rates (1 out of 10,000 live births and 1 out of 6,000 live births, respectively). The vast majority of conceptions involving trisomy for any of these three autosomes are nonetheless lost to miscarriage, as are all conceptions involving trisomy for any of the other autosomes. Similarly, monosomy for any of the autosomes is lethal in utero and therefore is not seen in the population. Because numerical chromosomal abnormalities generally result from independent meiotic events, parents who have one pregnancy with a numerical chromosomal abnormality are generally not at markedly increased risk above the general population to repeat the experience. Nonetheless, a small increased risk is generally cited for these couples to account for unusual situations, such as chromosomal translocations or gonadal mosaicism, described below.
Structural abnormalities of the autosomes are even more common in the population than are numerical abnormalities and include translocations of large pieces of chromosomes, as well as smaller deletions, insertions, or rearrangements. Indeed, about 5 percent of all cases of Down syndrome result not from classic trisomy 21 but from the presence of excess chromosome 21 material attached to the end of another chromosome as the result of a translocation event. If balanced, structural chromosomal abnormalities may be compatible with a normal phenotype, although unbalanced chromosome structural abnormalities can be every bit as devastating as numerical abnormalities. Furthermore, because many structural defects are inherited from a parent who is a balanced carrier, couples who have one pregnancy with a structural chromosomal abnormality generally are at significantly increased risk above the general population to repeat the experience. Clearly, the likelihood of a recurrence would depend on whether a balanced form of the structural defect occurs in one of the parents.
Even a small deletion or addition of autosomal materialtoo small to be seen by normal karyotyping methodscan produce serious malformations and mental retardation. One example is cri du chat (French: cry of the cat) syndrome, which is associated with the loss of a small segment of the short arm of chromosome 5. Newborns with this disorder have a mewing cry like that of a cat. Mental retardation is usually severe.
About 1 in 400 male and 1 in 650 female live births demonstrate some form of sex chromosome abnormality, although the symptoms of these conditions are generally much less severe than are those associated with autosomal abnormalities. Turner syndrome is a condition of females who, in the classic form, carry only a single X chromosome (45,X). Turner syndrome is characterized by a collection of symptoms, including short stature, webbed neck, and incomplete or absent development of secondary sex characteristics, leading to infertility. Although Turner syndrome is seen in about 1 in 2,500 to 1 in 5,000 female live births, the 45,X karyotype accounts for 10 to 20 percent of the chromosomal abnormalities seen in spontaneously aborted fetuses, demonstrating that almost all 45,X conceptions are lost to miscarriage. Indeed, the majority of liveborn females with Turner syndrome are diagnosed as mosaics, meaning that some proportion of their cells are 45,X while the rest are either 46,XX or 46,XY. The degree of clinical severity generally correlates inversely with the degree of mosaicism, so that females with a higher proportion of normal cells will tend to have a milder clinical outcome.
In contrast to Turner syndrome, which results from the absence of a sex chromosome, three alternative conditions result from the presence of an extra sex chromosome: Klinefelter syndrome, trisomy X, and 47,XYY syndrome. These conditions, each of which occurs in about 1 in 1,000 live births, are clinically mild, perhaps reflecting the fact that the Y chromosome carries relatively few genes, and, although the X chromosome is gene-rich, most of these genes become transcriptionally silent in all but one X chromosome in each somatic cell (i.e., all cells except eggs and sperm) via a process called X inactivation. The phenomenon of X inactivation prevents a female who carries two copies of the X chromosome in every cell from expressing twice the amount of gene products encoded exclusively on the X chromosome, in comparison with males, who carry a single X. In brief, at some point in early development one X chromosome in each somatic cell of a female embryo undergoes chemical modification and is inactivated so that gene expression no longer occurs from that template. This process is apparently random in most embryonic tissues, so that roughly half of the cells in each somatic tissue will inactivate the maternal X while the other half will inactivate the paternal X. Cells destined to give rise to eggs do not undergo X inactivation, and cells of the extra-embryonic tissues preferentially inactivate the paternal X, although the rationale for this preference is unclear. The inactivated X chromosome typically replicates later than other chromosomes, and it physically condenses to form a Barr body, a small structure found at the rim of the nucleus in female somatic cells between divisions (see photograph). The discovery of X inactivation is generally attributed to British geneticist Mary Lyon, and it is therefore often called lyonization.
The result of X inactivation is that all normal females are mosaics with regard to this chromosome, meaning that they are composed of some cells that express genes only from the maternal X chromosome and others that express genes only from the paternal X chromosome. Although the process is apparently random, not every female has an exact 1:1 ratio of maternal to paternal X inactivation. Indeed, studies suggest that ratios of X inactivation can vary. Furthermore, not all genes on the X chromosome are inactivated; a small number escape modification and remain actively expressed from both X chromosomes in the cell. Although this class of genes has not yet been fully characterized, aberrant expression of these genes has been raised as one possible explanation for the phenotypic abnormalities experienced by individuals with too few or too many X chromosomes.
Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY) occurs in males and is associated with increased stature and infertility. Gynecomastia (i.e., partial breast development in a male) is sometimes also seen. Males with Klinefelter syndrome, like normal females, inactivate one of their two X chromosomes in each cell, perhaps explaining, at least in part, the relatively mild clinical outcome.
Trisomy X (47,XXX) is seen in females and is generally also considered clinically benign, although menstrual irregularities or sterility have been noted in some cases. Females with trisomy X inactivate two of the three X chromosomes in each of their cells, again perhaps explaining the clinically benign outcome.
47,XYY syndrome also occurs in males and is associated with tall stature but few, if any, other clinical manifestations. There is some evidence of mild learning disability associated with each of the sex chromosome trisomies, although there is no evidence of mental retardation in these persons.
Persons with karyotypes of 48,XXXY or 49,XXXXY have been reported but are extremely rare. These individuals show clinical outcomes similar to those seen in males with Klinefelter syndrome but with slightly increased severity. In these persons the n 1 rule for X inactivation still holds, so that all but one of the X chromosomes present in each somatic cell is inactivated.
See original here:
Human genetic disease | Britannica.com
- June 11th At Westport, CT: Federal Red Flags, HIPAA Security Rules and Fraud Prevention [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- Do not learn Dvorak! [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- You Can’t Solve Problems By Making It Illegal To Have The Problem [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- A Force Fix for Healthcare [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- Yahble, HIT, Bubblecon, BIZDEV!, Solid State [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- 15 things that suck about the Palm Pre [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- What an Indie Genomics Lab Looks Like [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- Practice Fusion: Class D Felony? [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2010]
- Practice Fusion Responds [Last Updated On: March 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 7th, 2010]
- Practice Fusion: Do the math: $44,000 is a LIE [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- How Much Until Doctors Approve of 23andMe? [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- Biochemicals as Media, Not Methods [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- More Practice Fusion Reality Distortion [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- Same Test Results: 23andMe is Myriad is BRCA is Medicine [Last Updated On: March 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 12th, 2010]
- BRCA is 23andMe is Myriad is Medicine [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2010]
- Getting Serious About Genomics as Common Medical Practice [Last Updated On: March 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 15th, 2010]
- The New John Mackey of Genetics: Linda Avey? [Last Updated On: March 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 15th, 2010]
- Keep the Medical, Well, Medical [Last Updated On: March 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 16th, 2010]
- If 23andMe shuts down, it won’t be for some mundane reason like the bills weren’t paid [Last Updated On: March 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 16th, 2010]
- If I Run A Medical Practice, How Do I Use A 23andMe? [Last Updated On: March 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 17th, 2010]
- 23andMe Contract in Bad Faith [Last Updated On: March 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 19th, 2010]
- Doctors CANNOT Use 23andMe Due To 23andMe’s Bad Faith Contract [Last Updated On: March 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 20th, 2010]
- Pathway Compared to 23andMe and Navigenics [Last Updated On: March 22nd, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 22nd, 2010]
- There’s a Word for “Views Differ” When One View Is The State [Last Updated On: March 24th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 24th, 2010]
- Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. USPTO, et al. – Opinion [Last Updated On: March 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 29th, 2010]
- Birth of a Super Villain [Last Updated On: April 3rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 3rd, 2010]
- “Medical Products” like 23andMe must not become the new “Financial Products” [Last Updated On: April 4th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 4th, 2010]
- How I Would Apply Genomic Technology In Clinical Use Today [Last Updated On: April 5th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 5th, 2010]
- Gmail Enterprise: World’s Best EMR [Last Updated On: April 6th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 6th, 2010]
- Brief Primer on Health Law Compliance [Last Updated On: April 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 9th, 2010]
- Spoiler: You ARE the “Valids” [Last Updated On: April 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 9th, 2010]
- Rachel Lehmann-Haupt Line by Line Take Down [Last Updated On: April 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 9th, 2010]
- Is Medicare Bankrupt? What the Hell Is Going On? [Last Updated On: April 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 17th, 2010]
- The Big Shuffle: Medicare Cuts Rates by 21.3% (but not “technically”) [Last Updated On: April 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 17th, 2010]
- “Tech Hiring Binge” == “Fear for Your Job, Nerds” [Last Updated On: April 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 18th, 2010]
- How Bad is Bad? $.20 on the Private Medical Insurance Dollar [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2010]
- Update: How Bad is Bad? It Used to Be $.45 on the Medical Insurance Dollar [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2010]
- World’s Best “EMR” for $1000: Google Spreadsheets + iPad [Last Updated On: April 21st, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 21st, 2010]
- Don’t Insult Me with your “AOL Keyword” Strategy, Google Health [Last Updated On: April 21st, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 21st, 2010]
- How to Play LAWGAMES [Last Updated On: April 23rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 23rd, 2010]
- Top 4 Predatory Schemes Encroaching on American Medicine: Part 1 [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2010]
- What’s the Big Deal About iPads? [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2010]
- Got Google Android for Google I/O [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2010]
- Google Enterprise meets HIPAA and HITECH Compliant Laws [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2010]
- Pixels of Accuracy CHALENGE: Diagnostic Medical Imaging [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2010]
- 23andMe Launder AlioGenetics Doesn’t Even Bother to Remove 23andMe Logo [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2010]
- Anthem of CT Denies $600 Until “Subscriber Responds to our Coordination of Benefits Questionnaire” [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2010]
- Apple And Google Team Up To Launch Revolutionary Mobile Health System [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2010]
- Funny Pictures from This Year Building the Medical Practice [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2010]
- Remote Medical Video Monitoring on iPad and iPhone [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Google Calendar Overhead Waiting Room Display [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Various Whiteboards on Solid State Medical Operations [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- The Raw Facts about Counsyl [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Brawndo: Still Mutilating Thirst, Still Not Yet Sold at the Stop-n-Shop Pharmacy [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2010]
- Video: Google Enterprise to Outsource Medical Administration [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2010]
- Gattaca: “The Matrix” of Genomics [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2010]
- 23andMe Now Diagnoses Fatal Tay-Sachs Disease [Last Updated On: May 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 12th, 2010]
- Why Was Pathway Targeted for FDA Enforcement and Not 23andMe? [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2010]
- John Dolan on Aging and the Horrifying Conclusion of GWAS [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2010]
- Sam R. Riley Wants To Tell You About Practice Fusion [Last Updated On: May 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 17th, 2010]
- Response to “Genomic Medicine: Lost” [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2010]
- Death And Taxes: CMS to IRS [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2010]
- Please Stop Antagonizing the AMA [Last Updated On: May 26th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 26th, 2010]
- Dan Vorhaus, Attorney At Law, Legally Advises Medical Doctors Can Use 23andMe To Provide Medical Advice [Last Updated On: May 28th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 28th, 2010]
- Singularity Summit 2010 in San Francisco to Explore Intelligence Augmentation [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2010]
- OpenPCR: DNA amplification for anyone [Last Updated On: June 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: June 10th, 2010]
- FDA sends letters to 5 genetic testing companies [Last Updated On: June 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: June 11th, 2010]
- Amazon And The NIH Team Up To Put Human Genome In The Cloud [Last Updated On: March 31st, 2012] [Originally Added On: March 31st, 2012]
- ReproSource Comments on New Study Linking Infertility to Genetics [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2012]
- Genetics 101 Part 1: What are genes? - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Red Ice Radio - David Icke - Hour 1 - The Manipulation of Humanity - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Genetics Part 5: Human Genetic Disorders - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- C2CAM - The Nephilim, Genetic Manipulation [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Human Nature talk with Robert Sapolsky, Gabor Mate, James Gilligan, Richard Wilkinson - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Human Genetic Diseases - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Alien Scientist on Genetics, Implants [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Research and Markets: Genetics, 6th Edition International Student Version Continues To Educate Today's Students for ... [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]
- Myriad Genetics to Present at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2012 Health Care Conference [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]
- Genetics may explain some people's dislike of meat [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]
- 'Blond Genes' May Vary Around the World [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]