In 1944, a Columbia University doctoral student in genetics named Evelyn Witkin made a fortuitous mistake. During her first experiment in a laboratory at Cold Spring Harbor, in New York, she accidentally irradiated millions of E. coli with a lethal dose of ultraviolet light. When she returned the following day to check on the samples, they were all dead except for one, in which four bacterial cells had survived and continued to grow. Somehow, those cells were resistant to UV radiation. To Witkin, it seemed like a remarkably lucky coincidence that any cells in the culture had emerged with precisely the mutation they needed to survive so much so that she questioned whether it was a coincidence at all.
For the next two decades, Witkin sought to understand how and why these mutants had emerged. Her research led her to what is now known as the SOS response, a DNA repair mechanism that bacteria employ when their genomes are damaged, during which dozens of genes become active and the rate of mutation goes up. Those extra mutations are more often detrimental than beneficial, but they enable adaptations, such as the development of resistance to UV or antibiotics.
The question that has tormented some evolutionary biologists ever since is whether nature favored this arrangement. Is the upsurge in mutations merely a secondary consequence of a repair process inherently prone to error? Or, as some researchers claim, is the increase in the mutation rate itself an evolved adaptation, one that helps bacteria evolve advantageous traits more quickly in stressful environments?
The scientific challenge has not just been to demonstrate convincingly that harsh environments cause nonrandom mutations. It has also been to find a plausible mechanism consistent with the rest of molecular biology that could make lucky mutations more likely. Waves of studies in bacteria and more complex organisms have sought those answers for decades.
The latest and perhaps best answer for explaining some kinds of mutations, anyway has emerged from studies of yeast, as reported in June in PLOS Biology. A team led by Jonathan Houseley, a specialist in molecular biology and genetics at the Babraham Institute in Cambridge, proposed a mechanism that drives more mutation specifically in regions of the yeast genome where it could be most adaptive.
Its a totally new way that the environment can have an impact on the genome to allow adaptation in response to need. It is one of the most directed processes weve seen yet, said Philip Hastings, professor of molecular and human genetics at Baylor College of Medicine, who was not involved in the Houseley groups experiments. Other scientists contacted for this story also praised the work, though most cautioned that much about the controversial idea was still speculative and needed more support.
Rather than asking very broad questions like are mutations always random? I wanted to take a more mechanistic approach, Houseley said. He and his colleagues directed their attention to a specific kind of mutation called copy number variation. DNA often contains multiple copies of extended sequences of base pairs or even whole genes. The exact number can vary among individuals because, when cells are duplicating their DNA before cell division, certain mistakes can insert or delete copies of gene sequences. In humans, for instance, 5 to 10 percent of the genome shows copy number variation from person to person and some of these variations have been linked to cancer, diabetes, autism and a host of genetic disorders. Houseley suspected that in at least some cases, this variation in the number of gene copies might be a response to stresses or hazards in the environment.
In 2015, Houseley and his colleagues described a mechanism by which yeast cells seemed to be driving extra copy number variation in genes associated with ribosomes, the parts of a cell that synthesize proteins. However, they did not prove that this increase was a purposefully adaptive response to a change or constraint in the cellular environment. Nevertheless, to them it seemed that the yeast was making more copies of the ribosomal genes when nutrients were abundant and the demand for making protein might be higher.
Houseley therefore decided to test whether similar mechanisms might act on genes more directly activated by hazardous changes in the environment. In their 2017 paper, he and his team focused on CUP1, a gene that helps yeast resist the toxic effects of environmental copper. They found that when yeast was exposed to copper, the variation in the number of copies of CUP1 in the cells increased. On average, most cells had fewer copies of the gene, but the yeast cells that gained more copies about 10 percent of the total population became more resistant to copper and flourished. The small number of cells that did the right thing, Houseley said, were at such an advantage that they were able to outcompete everything else.
But that change did not in itself mean much: If the environmental copper was causing mutations, then the change in CUP1 copy number variation might have been no more than a meaningless consequence of the higher mutation rate. To rule out that possibility, the researchers cleverly re-engineered the CUP1 gene so that it would respond to a harmless, nonmutagenic sugar, galactose, instead of copper. When these altered yeast cells were exposed to galactose, the variation in their number of copies of the gene changed, too.
The cells seemed to be directing greater variation to the exact place in their genome where it would be useful. After more work, the researchers identified elements of the biological mechanism behind this phenomenon. It was already known that when cells replicatetheir DNA, the replication mechanism sometimes stalls. Usually the mechanism can restart and pick up where it left off. When it cant, the cell can go back to the beginning of the replication process, but in doing so, it sometimes accidentally deletes a gene sequence or makes extra copies of it. That is what causes normal copy number variation. But Houseley and his team made the case that a combination of factors makes these copying errors especially likely to hit genes that are actively responding to environmental stresses, which means that they are more likely to show copy number variation.
The key point is that these effects center on genes responding to the environment, and that they could give natural selection extra opportunities to fine-tune which levels of gene expression might be optimal against certain challenges. The results seem to present experimental evidence that a challenging environment could galvanize cells into controlling those genetic changes that would best improve their fitness. They may also seem reminiscent of the outmoded, pre-Darwinian ideas of the French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, who believed that organisms evolved by passing their environmentally acquired characteristics along to their offspring. Houseley maintains, however, that this similarity is only superficial.
What we have defined is a mechanism that has arisen entirely through Darwinian selection of random mutations to give a process that stimulates nonrandom mutations at useful sites, Houseley said. It is not Lamarckian adaptation. It just achieves some of the same ends without the problems involved with Lamarckian adaptation.
Ever since 1943, when the microbiologist Salvador Luria and the biophysicist Max Delbrck showed with Nobel prize-winning experiments that mutations in E. coli occur randomly, observations like the bacterial SOS response have made some biologists wonder whether there might be important loopholes to that rule. For example, in a controversial paper published in Nature in 1988, John Cairns of Harvard and his team found that when they placed bacteria that could not digest the milk sugar lactose in an environment where that sugar was the sole food source, the cells soonevolved the ability to convert the lactose into energy. Cairns argued that this result showed that cells had mechanisms to make certain mutations preferentially when they would be beneficial.
The rest is here:
Beating the Odds for Lucky Mutations - Quanta Magazine
- June 11th At Westport, CT: Federal Red Flags, HIPAA Security Rules and Fraud Prevention [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- Do not learn Dvorak! [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- You Can’t Solve Problems By Making It Illegal To Have The Problem [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- A Force Fix for Healthcare [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- Yahble, HIT, Bubblecon, BIZDEV!, Solid State [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- 15 things that suck about the Palm Pre [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- What an Indie Genomics Lab Looks Like [Last Updated On: November 7th, 2009] [Originally Added On: November 7th, 2009]
- Practice Fusion: Class D Felony? [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2010] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2010]
- Practice Fusion Responds [Last Updated On: March 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 7th, 2010]
- Practice Fusion: Do the math: $44,000 is a LIE [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- How Much Until Doctors Approve of 23andMe? [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- Biochemicals as Media, Not Methods [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- More Practice Fusion Reality Distortion [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2010]
- Same Test Results: 23andMe is Myriad is BRCA is Medicine [Last Updated On: March 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 12th, 2010]
- BRCA is 23andMe is Myriad is Medicine [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2010]
- Getting Serious About Genomics as Common Medical Practice [Last Updated On: March 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 15th, 2010]
- The New John Mackey of Genetics: Linda Avey? [Last Updated On: March 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 15th, 2010]
- Keep the Medical, Well, Medical [Last Updated On: March 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 16th, 2010]
- If 23andMe shuts down, it won’t be for some mundane reason like the bills weren’t paid [Last Updated On: March 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 16th, 2010]
- If I Run A Medical Practice, How Do I Use A 23andMe? [Last Updated On: March 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 17th, 2010]
- 23andMe Contract in Bad Faith [Last Updated On: March 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 19th, 2010]
- Doctors CANNOT Use 23andMe Due To 23andMe’s Bad Faith Contract [Last Updated On: March 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 20th, 2010]
- Pathway Compared to 23andMe and Navigenics [Last Updated On: March 22nd, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 22nd, 2010]
- There’s a Word for “Views Differ” When One View Is The State [Last Updated On: March 24th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 24th, 2010]
- Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. USPTO, et al. – Opinion [Last Updated On: March 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: March 29th, 2010]
- Birth of a Super Villain [Last Updated On: April 3rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 3rd, 2010]
- “Medical Products” like 23andMe must not become the new “Financial Products” [Last Updated On: April 4th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 4th, 2010]
- How I Would Apply Genomic Technology In Clinical Use Today [Last Updated On: April 5th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 5th, 2010]
- Gmail Enterprise: World’s Best EMR [Last Updated On: April 6th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 6th, 2010]
- Brief Primer on Health Law Compliance [Last Updated On: April 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 9th, 2010]
- Spoiler: You ARE the “Valids” [Last Updated On: April 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 9th, 2010]
- Rachel Lehmann-Haupt Line by Line Take Down [Last Updated On: April 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 9th, 2010]
- Is Medicare Bankrupt? What the Hell Is Going On? [Last Updated On: April 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 17th, 2010]
- The Big Shuffle: Medicare Cuts Rates by 21.3% (but not “technically”) [Last Updated On: April 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 17th, 2010]
- “Tech Hiring Binge” == “Fear for Your Job, Nerds” [Last Updated On: April 18th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 18th, 2010]
- How Bad is Bad? $.20 on the Private Medical Insurance Dollar [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2010]
- Update: How Bad is Bad? It Used to Be $.45 on the Medical Insurance Dollar [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2010]
- World’s Best “EMR” for $1000: Google Spreadsheets + iPad [Last Updated On: April 21st, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 21st, 2010]
- Don’t Insult Me with your “AOL Keyword” Strategy, Google Health [Last Updated On: April 21st, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 21st, 2010]
- How to Play LAWGAMES [Last Updated On: April 23rd, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 23rd, 2010]
- Top 4 Predatory Schemes Encroaching on American Medicine: Part 1 [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2010]
- What’s the Big Deal About iPads? [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2010]
- Got Google Android for Google I/O [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2010]
- Google Enterprise meets HIPAA and HITECH Compliant Laws [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2010]
- Pixels of Accuracy CHALENGE: Diagnostic Medical Imaging [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2010]
- 23andMe Launder AlioGenetics Doesn’t Even Bother to Remove 23andMe Logo [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2010] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2010]
- Anthem of CT Denies $600 Until “Subscriber Responds to our Coordination of Benefits Questionnaire” [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2010]
- Apple And Google Team Up To Launch Revolutionary Mobile Health System [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2010]
- Funny Pictures from This Year Building the Medical Practice [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2010]
- Remote Medical Video Monitoring on iPad and iPhone [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Google Calendar Overhead Waiting Room Display [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Various Whiteboards on Solid State Medical Operations [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- The Raw Facts about Counsyl [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2010]
- Brawndo: Still Mutilating Thirst, Still Not Yet Sold at the Stop-n-Shop Pharmacy [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2010]
- Video: Google Enterprise to Outsource Medical Administration [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2010]
- Gattaca: “The Matrix” of Genomics [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2010]
- 23andMe Now Diagnoses Fatal Tay-Sachs Disease [Last Updated On: May 12th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 12th, 2010]
- Why Was Pathway Targeted for FDA Enforcement and Not 23andMe? [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2010]
- John Dolan on Aging and the Horrifying Conclusion of GWAS [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2010]
- Sam R. Riley Wants To Tell You About Practice Fusion [Last Updated On: May 17th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 17th, 2010]
- Response to “Genomic Medicine: Lost” [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2010]
- Death And Taxes: CMS to IRS [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2010]
- Please Stop Antagonizing the AMA [Last Updated On: May 26th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 26th, 2010]
- Dan Vorhaus, Attorney At Law, Legally Advises Medical Doctors Can Use 23andMe To Provide Medical Advice [Last Updated On: May 28th, 2010] [Originally Added On: May 28th, 2010]
- Singularity Summit 2010 in San Francisco to Explore Intelligence Augmentation [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2010] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2010]
- OpenPCR: DNA amplification for anyone [Last Updated On: June 10th, 2010] [Originally Added On: June 10th, 2010]
- FDA sends letters to 5 genetic testing companies [Last Updated On: June 11th, 2010] [Originally Added On: June 11th, 2010]
- Amazon And The NIH Team Up To Put Human Genome In The Cloud [Last Updated On: March 31st, 2012] [Originally Added On: March 31st, 2012]
- ReproSource Comments on New Study Linking Infertility to Genetics [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2012]
- Genetics 101 Part 1: What are genes? - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Red Ice Radio - David Icke - Hour 1 - The Manipulation of Humanity - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Genetics Part 5: Human Genetic Disorders - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- C2CAM - The Nephilim, Genetic Manipulation [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Human Nature talk with Robert Sapolsky, Gabor Mate, James Gilligan, Richard Wilkinson - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Human Genetic Diseases - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Alien Scientist on Genetics, Implants [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2012] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2012]
- Research and Markets: Genetics, 6th Edition International Student Version Continues To Educate Today's Students for ... [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]
- Myriad Genetics to Present at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2012 Health Care Conference [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]
- Genetics may explain some people's dislike of meat [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]
- 'Blond Genes' May Vary Around the World [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2012] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2012]