Share.

We only received Halo Wars 2 a few days ago, which was enough time to complete the campaign but not to get a full sense of its several multiplayer modes, or how they work in a live environment. Below youll see my thoughts on what Ive played so far, and soon Ill update with more thorough impressions of multiplayer and Blitz, plus my final score.

I admire Microsofts attempt to expand its prized Halo series into something that spans beyond an endless procession of first-person shooters, and with Halo Wars 2 (and Halo Wars before it) we get to experience this sci-fi universe from the overhead perspective of a real-time strategy game, which emphasizes the scope of its battles. The controls for a game of this complexity may never quite comfortably fit onto a gamepad, but its an otherwise decent if technically rough game with a couple of ideas to throw at the wall to see if they stick.

Got feedback on our player?

Halo Wars 2 is an attractive-looking real-time strategy game that does a good job of representing the Halo universe in both graphics and sound. And the story - while not as large in scope as a main Halo game - introduces a threatening villain as the leader of a new faction that rises from the ashes of the Covenant, the Banished. On the other side, a relatable new AI character carries some cardboard-cutout co-stars, including the returning Captain Cutter and his three interchangeable Spartans. Occasional CGI cutscenes look fantastic, to the degree that they really make me want to watch that Halo movie that will probably never happen.

The single-player campaigns 12 missions took me roughly eight hours to complete, including restarting a couple of them a few times. The designs are nothing special though they avoid the trap of basic go destroy the enemy base, they lean heavily on hero-focused objectives of leading your Spartans around the map and holdout missions against waves of enemies. Theres enough variety to keep them from feeling repetitive, but only a couple think outside the box of what StarCraft did almost 20 years ago, and the static base management on pre-determined plots doesnt give a lot of flexibility when it comes to build orders. Much of it is in the vein of the campaign as tutorial for multiplayer model, teaching you which units counter what and how to capture the majority of a maps control points to win. Each one does come with a range of side objectives (such as keeping a unit alive, destroying extra bases, or collecting resources from the map) to give them replayability on top of simply turning up the difficulty, though.

Halo Wars 2 feels most limited is in its controls - and that's not surpising.

Where Halo Wars 2 feels most limited is in its controls, and thats not at all surprising. Gamepad controls for an RTS are always going to be clumsy at best, and though I didnt expect it to fully solve this problem, developer Creative Assembly doesnt seem to have done a lot to design around it, either. For example, the speed with which units tend to die in combat isnt very forgiving when you consider how slowly most people are likely to be able to react. Its definitely workable, using a very similar layout to what the first Halo Wars has, with some clever changes like using a double-tap of the right bumper to select all units. But even things like that cant make up for the shortage of buttons and precision on the controller relative to a mouse and keyboard.

Got feedback on our player?

If, for instance, youre trying to get your Warthogs and Scorpion tanks out of range of the anti-vehicle gun of a Hunter before they can inflict real damage and move up your anti-infantry Hellbringer flamethrower units to counter, its tricky to pull off in the heat of battle. You have to select all units on screen using the right bumper, then use the right trigger to cycle through the available unit types which can be a lot in a large army and then you can move that unit type independently. It works, but usually not quickly enough, especially if you have multiple vehicle types to move to safety. Then it might be faster to double-tap a unit with the A button to select all of that type, then hold right-trigger and double-tap one of the other types to select both at once. Good luck with that if youre working with air units.

Most people will likely throw all their units at a target and hope for the best.

That said, its impressive that Creative Assembly was able to pack all the controls you need, with the ability to assign up to four control groups to the d-pad and even queue up move commands, onto a gamepad. The catch is that much of that is accessed by holding the right trigger to change the functions of the rest of the buttons, which means you basically need to learn twice as many controls as you do for most games. Again, its not insurmountable or unusable, but its no picnic. Im sure some people out there will get good enough with these controls to be relatively fast and become competitive with them, but by and large I expect most people will get through the campaign and many multiplayer matches largely by selecting all units on screen and throwing them into battle to fend for themselves.

Seemingly to compensate for the lack of micromanagement dexterity, youre able to turn the tide of many of those battles from above by casting support abilities that can buff your troops or rain down fire and reinforcements on the enemy. Some of these are strikingly powerful when fully upgraded, such as the Archer missiles that destroy a swath of enemies and the extremely useful ODST soldier drops, and using them at the right moment feels great.

Got feedback on our player?

What did not feel great about the campaign was the frequent bugs I encountered when playing on Xbox One (Ive yet to try the PC version), which was much greater than I expected from a Halo game. Ive had crashes, infinite loading screens, five- to 10-second freezes, stuck units, mission events failing to trigger (forcing me to replay the mission) and more. I got through it, but I was surprised to see such technical roughness. Fortunately, thus far the glitches have been limited entirely to the campaign.

Domination gives support powers lots of moments to shine.

Most of Halo Wars 2s long-term appeal is in its multiplayer modes, which are to its credit significantly more diverse and in some ways interesting than you typically see in an RTS. On top of the standard deathmatch mode theres the territory-control Domination style (reminiscent of Relics Company of Heroes and Dawn of War 2 multiplayer) which really gives the support powers a lot of moments to shine. Spotting a bunch of enemy units camped on top of a control point is an excellent time to use a bombardment ability, for example. And because youre given the choice of one of six commander characters (three per side) with different sets of support abilities, you have lots of options there - including some who can temporarily cloak groups of units or create holographic diversions. But again, the base building options feel limited by the predescribed locations and very limited build orders, which means much of the variety is going to be down to which of the handful of maps youre playing on.

Got feedback on our player?

In its own section of the menu, separate from the conventional multiplayer modes, is Blitz a faster, more frantic mode where instead of building bases to produce resources and more troops, you summon soldiers using a deck of cards youve prepared ahead of time. I generally like this kind of randomization because it prevents you from falling into patterns and repeating the same successful tactics over and over again, because you might not have access to the card youd want to use at the moment you want to use it. Improvisation feels good. Alas, I dont think its a great fit for a competitive multiplayer game, because all too often you win or lose based on a combination of your own luck and the enemys, rather than the test of skill on the asymmetrical but level playing field I expect from an RTS.

Blitz's dependence on luck may shorten its long-term appeal.

Blitz is fun, but I think that dependence on luck is going to shorten its long-term appeal. And when that luck extends to giving you random new cards, some of which are unique to the six leaders, in upgrade packs that are also for sale in the store, I worry even more. You cant directly buy the power you want, but you can buy another shot at it. Hopefully the matchmaking system is smart enough not to pair people with crazy-powerful cards in their decks against those with more modest decks, but that remains to be seen.

Got feedback on our player?

Finally, theres a single-player and co-op variant of Blitz called Firefight thats about holding out against ever-increasing waves of enemies as they try to overwhelm you and capture two of three points on the map. Im having some good fun in there, where the randomness is about creating unexpected scenarios without the shame of losing to another human you think you shouldve beaten, and the balance is tweaked so that swarms of enemy units explode easily under my Banished lasers. Thats a very good use for the card mechanic.

I'll keep playing and will have more to say about multiplayer by the time Halo Wars 2 fully launches on February 21 (it's now available for early access with a preorder), so check back then for my final score.

Dan Stapleton is IGN's Reviews Editor. You can follow himon Twitterto hear gaming rants and lots of random Simpsons references.

Follow this link:

Halo Wars 2 Review in Progress - IGN