TIME Science space Strange Visitors From the Edge of the Solar System Sometimes a comet isn't a comet Art Montes De Oca; Getty Images A pair of sort-of comets pose a puzzle for astronomers

The term Oort Cloud may be obscure for many people, but its familiar terrain for astronomy buffs. Its a giant spherical swarm of trillions of proto-comets, lurking at the outer fringes of the Solar System, so far away that it may stretch a quarter of the way to the nearest star. Theyre proto because theyre not technically comets unless they get knocked out of orbit and fall toward the heat of the Sun, whose warmth turns their long-frozen ices into a halo of dusty gas and, sometimes, a tail as well.

A pair of very unusual objects announced at last weeks Planetary Science Meeting in Tucson, however, have complicated this seemingly straightforward story. The first, found in 2013, has an orbit that clearly shows it came from the Oort Cloudbut while it resembles a comet in some ways, it didnt light up like one even after it warmed. The second, found just this past September, also came from the fringes of the Solar System. This one doesnt even resemble a comet, let alone act like one: it looks more like a rocky asteroid.

Except asteroids arent supposed to live in the Oort Cloudand that creates just the sort of mystery scientists love. Were all very excited, admits Karen Meech, of the University of Hawaii, who led the discovery team. But while both objects surprised researchers, both turn out to confirm two pieces of cosmic wisdom, one from a half-century ago and the other much more recent.

The old wisdom comes from Jan Oort himself, the mid-20th-century Dutch astronomer the Oort cloud is named for. He theorized that long-period comets, with highly elongated orbits lasting more than 200 years, came from a distant, spherical cloud that surrounds the Solar System. He figured this out based on just 13 comets, says Meech. Its really amazing.

The idea is that the comets formed closer in, along with the rest of the Solar System, but that many were flung outward in gravitational interactions with Neptune and other giant planets. That notion was reinforced long after Oorts time, when planetary scientists realized that the giant planets might have changed their orbits significantly soon after they were born; that motion would have ejected icy bodies in vast numbers.

Oort also suggested that the objects that eventually fell in again would be especially bright the first time around, since theyd have lots of ice on their surfacesprecisely what happened when Comet Hale-Bopp showed up in 1997. On their very first passage through the inner Solar System, says Meech, all of that sublimates away, so after that you just dont see them.

The object discovered in 2013, she says, which is known as (deep breath) C/2013 P2 Pan-STARRS, fits the profile of what an Oort cloud comet should look like on a second or later return to the inner Solar System, and, says Meech it may be proof at last that Oort was correct.

Even as the astronomers were trying to figure out what they were seeing, though, the second object, C/2014 S3 Pan-STARRS, showed up (in both cases, the objects were found by the Pan-STARRS1 telescope, atop Mauna Kea, in Hawaii). It didnt act like a comet either, but unlike the first object, it also didnt much resemble one, as a close look at its composition revealed.

And that seems to support an idea advanced back in 2011 by Kevin Walsh, of the Southwest Research Institute, along with several colleagues. Their computer models of the newborn Solar System found that the giant planets should indeed have migrated from their original positions, moving first in toward the Sun, then out to where they are today. As they moved out, says Meech, they would have dragged about fourteen Earth masses worth of material with them and thrown it outward.

View post:

Strange Visitors From the Edge of the Solar System