Stephen Wolfram blames himself for not changing the face of physics sooner.
I do fault myself for not having done this 20 years ago, the physicist turned software entrepreneur says. To be fair, I also fault some people in the physics community for trying to prevent it happening 20 years ago. They were successful. Back in 2002, after years of labor, Wolfram self-published A New Kind of Science, a 1,200-page magnum opus detailing the general idea that nature runs on ultrasimple computational rules. The book was an instant best seller and received glowing reviews: the New York Times called it a first-class intellectual thrill. But Wolframs arguments found few converts among scientists. Their work carried on, and he went back to running his software company Wolfram Research. And that is where things remaineduntil last month, when, accompanied by breathless press coverage (and a 448-page preprint paper), Wolfram announced a possible path to the fundamental theory of physics based on his unconventional ideas. Once again, physicists are unconvincedin no small part, they say, because existing theories do a better job than his model.
At its heart, Wolframs new approach is a computational picture of the cosmosone where the fundamental rules that the universe obeys resemble lines of computer code. This code acts on a graph, a network of points with connections between them, that grows and changes as the digital logic of the code clicks forward, one step at a time. According to Wolfram, this graph is the fundamental stuff of the universe. From the humble beginning of a small graph and a short set of rules, fabulously complex structures can rapidly appear. Even when the underlying rules for a system are extremely simple, the behavior of the system as a whole can be essentially arbitrarily rich and complex, he wrote in a blog post summarizing the idea. And this got me thinking: Could the universe work this way? Wolfram and his collaborator Jonathan Gorard, a physics Ph.D. candidate at the University of Cambridge and a consultant at Wolfram Research, found that this kind of model could reproduce some of the aspects of quantum theory and Einsteins general theory of relativity, the two fundamental pillars of modern physics.
But Wolframs models ability to incorporate currently accepted physics is not necessarily that impressive. Its this sort of infinitely flexible philosophy where, regardless of what anyone said was true about physics, they could then assert, Oh, yeah, you could graft something like that onto our model, says Scott Aaronson, a quantum computer scientist at the University of Texas at Austin.
When asked about such criticisms, Gorard agreesto a point. Were just kind of fitting things, he says. But we're only doing that so we can actually go and do a systematized search for specific rules that fit those of our universe.
Wolfram and Gorard have not yet found any computational rules meeting those requirements, however. And without those rules, they cannot make any definite, concrete new predictions that could be experimentally tested. Indeed, according to critics, Wolframs model has yet to even reproduce the most basic quantitative predictions of conventional physics. The experimental predictions of [quantum physics and general relativity] have been confirmed to many decimal placesin some cases, to a precision of one part in [10 billion], says Daniel Harlow, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. So far I see no indication that this could be done using the simple kinds of [computational rules] advocated by Wolfram. The successes he claims are, at best, qualitative. Further, even that qualitative success is limited: There are crucial features of modern physics missing from the model. And the parts of physics that it can qualitatively reproduce are mostly there because Wolfram and his colleagues put them in to begin with. This arrangement is akin to announcing, If we suppose that a rabbit was coming out of the hat, then remarkably, this rabbit would be coming out of the hat, Aaronson says. And then [going] on and on about how remarkable it is.
Unsurprisingly, Wolfram disagrees. He claims that his model has replicated most of fundamental physics already. From an extremely simple model, were able to reproduce special relativity, general relativity and the core results of quantum mechanics, he says, which, of course, are what have led to so many precise quantitative predictions of physics over the past century.
Even Wolframs critics acknowledge he is right about at least one thing: it is genuinely interesting that simple computational rules can lead to such complex phenomena. But, they hasten to add, that is hardly an original discovery. The idea goes back long before Wolfram, Harlow says. He cites the work of computing pioneers Alan Turing in the 1930s and John von Neumann in the 1950s, as well as that of mathematician John Conway in the early 1970s. (Conway, a professor at Princeton University, died of COVID-19 last month.) To the contrary, Wolfram insists that he was the first to discover that virtually boundless complexity could arise from simple rules in the 1980s. John von Neumann, he absolutely didnt see this, Wolfram says. John Conway, same thing.
Born in London in 1959, Wolfram was a child prodigy who studied at Eton College and the University of Oxford before earning a Ph.D. in theoretical physics at the California Institute of Technology in 1979at the age of 20. After his Ph.D., Caltech promptly hired Wolfram to work alongside his mentors, including physicist Richard Feynman. I dont know of any others in this field that have the wide range of understanding of Dr. Wolfram, Feynman wrote in a letter recommending him for the first ever round of MacArthur genius grants in 1981. He seems to have worked on everything and has some original or careful judgement on any topic. Wolfram won the grantat age 21, making him among the youngest ever to receive the awardand became a faculty member at Caltech and then a long-term member at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. While at the latter, he became interested in simple computational systems and then moved to the University of Illinois in 1986 to start a research center to study the emergence of complex phenomena. In 1987 he founded Wolfram Research, and shortly after he left academia altogether. The software companys flagship product, Mathematica, is a powerful and impressive piece of mathematics software that has sold millions of copies and is today nearly ubiquitous in physics and mathematics departments worldwide.
Then, in the 1990s, Wolfram decided to go back to scientific researchbut without the support and input provided by a traditional research environment. By his own account, he sequestered himself for about a decade, putting together what would eventually become A New Kind of Science with the assistance of a small army of his employees.
Upon the release of the book, the media was ensorcelled by the romantic image of the heroic outsider returning from the wilderness to single-handedly change all of science. Wired dubbed Wolfram the man who cracked the code to everything on its cover. Wolfram has earned some bragging rights, the New York Times proclaimed. No one has contributed more seminally to this new way of thinking about the world. Yet then, as now, researchers largely ignored and derided his work. Theres a tradition of scientists approaching senility to come up with grand, improbable theories, the late physicist Freeman Dyson told Newsweek back in 2002. Wolfram is unusual in that hes doing this in his 40s.
Wolframs story is exactly the sort that many people want to hear, because it matches the familiar beats of dramatic tales from science history that they already know: the lone genius (usually white and male), laboring in obscurity and rejected by the establishment, emerges from isolation, triumphantly grasping a piece of the Truth. But that is rarelyif everhow scientific discovery actually unfolds. There are examples from the history of science that superficially fit this image: Think of Albert Einstein toiling away on relativity as an obscure Swiss patent clerk at the turn of the 20th century. Or, for a more recent example, consider mathematician Andrew Wiles working in his attic for years to prove Fermats last theorem before finally announcing his success in 1995. But portraying those discoveries as the work of a solo genius, romantic as it is, belies the real working process of science. Science is a group effort. Einstein was in close contact with researchers of his day, and Wiless work followed a path laid out by other mathematicians just a few years before he got started. Both of them were active, regular participants in the wider scientific community. And even so, they remain exceptions to the rule. Most major scientific breakthroughs are far more collaborativequantum physics, for example, was developed slowly over a quarter-century by dozens of physicists around the world.
I think the popular notion that physicists are all in search of the eureka moment in which they will discover the theory of everything is an unfortunate one, says Katie Mack, a cosmologist at North Carolina State University. We do want to find better, more complete theories. But the way we go about that is to test and refine our models, look for inconsistencies and incrementally work our way toward better, more complete models.
Most scientists would readily tell you that their discipline isand always has beena collaborative, communal process. Nobody can revolutionize a scientific field without first getting the critical appraisal and eventual validation of their peers. Today this requirement is performed through peer reviewa process Wolframs critics say he has circumvented with his announcement. Certainly theres no reason that Wolfram and his colleagues should be able to bypass formal peer review, Mack says. And they definitely have a much better chance of getting useful feedback from the physics community if they publish their results in a format we actually have the tools to deal with.
Mack is not alone in her concerns. Its hard to expect physicists to comb through hundreds of pages of a new theory out of the blue, with no buildup in the form of papers, seminars and conference presentations, says Sean Carroll, a physicist at Caltech. Personally, I feel it would be more effective to write short papers addressing specific problems with this kind of approach rather than proclaiming a breakthrough without much vetting.
So why did Wolfram announce his ideas this way? Why not go the traditional route? I don't really believe in anonymous peer review, he says. I think its corrupt. Its all a giant story of somewhat corrupt gaming, I would say. I think its sort of inevitable that happens with these very large systems. Its a pity.
So what are Wolframs goals? He says he wants the attention and feedback of the physics community. But his unconventional approachsoliciting public comments on an exceedingly long paperalmost ensures it shall remain obscure. Wolfram says he wants physicists respect. The ones consulted for this story said gaining it would require him to recognize and engage with the prior work of others in the scientific community.
And when provided with some of the responses from other physicists regarding his work, Wolfram is singularly unenthused. Im disappointed by the naivete of the questions that youre communicating, he grumbles. I deserve better.
The rest is here:
Physicists Criticize Stephen Wolfram's 'Theory of Everything' - Scientific American
- The Quantum Computer Revolution Is Closer Than You May Think - National Review [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- Time Crystals Could be the Key to the First Quantum Computer - TrendinTech [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- quantum computing - WIRED UK [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- Chinese scientists build world's first quantum computing machine - India Today [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- Here's How We Can Achieve Mass-Produced Quantum Computers - ScienceAlert [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- D-Wave partners with U of T to move quantum computing along - Financial Post [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- Team develops first blockchain that can't be hacked by quantum computer - Siliconrepublic.com [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- Telstra just wants a quantum computer to offer as-a-service - ZDNet [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- Research collaborative pursues advanced quantum computing - Phys.Org [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- Quantum Computing Market Forecast 2017-2022 | Market ... [Last Updated On: June 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 6th, 2017]
- Quantum Computing Is Real, and D-Wave Just Open ... - WIRED [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- FinDEVr London: Preparing for the Dark Side of Quantum Computing - GlobeNewswire (press release) [Last Updated On: June 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 9th, 2017]
- Purdue, Microsoft to Collaborate on Quantum Computer - Photonics.com [Last Updated On: June 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 9th, 2017]
- Scientists May Have Found a Way to Combat Quantum Computer Blockchain Hacking - Futurism [Last Updated On: June 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 9th, 2017]
- Microsoft and Purdue work on scalable topological quantum computer - Next Big Future [Last Updated On: June 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 12th, 2017]
- HYPRES Expands Efforts in Quantum Computing with Launch of European Subsidiary SeeQC - Business Wire (press release) [Last Updated On: June 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 12th, 2017]
- From the Abacus to Supercomputers to Quantum Computers - Duke Today [Last Updated On: June 13th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 13th, 2017]
- Accenture, Biogen, 1QBit Launch Quantum Computing App to ... - HIT Consultant [Last Updated On: June 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 14th, 2017]
- The US and China "Quantum Computing Arms Race" Will Change Long-Held Dynamics in Commerce, Intelligence ... - PR Newswire (press release) [Last Updated On: June 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 14th, 2017]
- Quantum Computing Technologies markets will reach $10.7 billion by 2024 - PR Newswire (press release) [Last Updated On: June 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 14th, 2017]
- A Hybrid of Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Is Spawning New Ventures - IEEE Spectrum [Last Updated On: June 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 14th, 2017]
- KPN CISO details Quantum computing attack dangers - Mobile World Live [Last Updated On: June 16th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 16th, 2017]
- Get ahead in quantum computing AND attract Goldman Sachs - eFinancialCareers [Last Updated On: June 16th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 16th, 2017]
- Accenture, 1QBit partner for drug discovery through quantum ... - ZDNet [Last Updated On: June 16th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 16th, 2017]
- Toward optical quantum computing - MIT News [Last Updated On: June 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 17th, 2017]
- Quantum computing, the machines of tomorrow | The Japan Times - The Japan Times [Last Updated On: June 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 17th, 2017]
- Its time to decide how quantum computing will help your ... [Last Updated On: June 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 18th, 2017]
- Israel Enters Quantum Computer Race, Placing Encryption at Ever-Greater Risk - Sputnik International [Last Updated On: June 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 20th, 2017]
- Prototype device enables photon-photon interactions at room ... - Phys.Org [Last Updated On: June 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 20th, 2017]
- Dow and 1QBit Announce Collaboration Agreement on Quantum Computing - Business Wire (press release) [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2017]
- Imperfect crystals may be perfect storage method for quantum computing - Digital Trends [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2017]
- Dow Chemical, 1QBit Ink Quantum Computing Development Deal - Zacks.com [Last Updated On: June 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 22nd, 2017]
- Google on track for quantum computer breakthrough by end of 2017 - New Scientist [Last Updated On: June 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 22nd, 2017]
- USC to lead project to build super-speedy quantum computers - USC News [Last Updated On: June 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 24th, 2017]
- The Quantum Computer Factory That's Taking on Google and IBM ... - WIRED [Last Updated On: June 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 24th, 2017]
- The weird science of quantum computing, communications and encryption - C4ISR & Networks [Last Updated On: June 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 27th, 2017]
- Multi-coloured photons in 100 dimensions may make quantum ... - Cosmos [Last Updated On: June 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 30th, 2017]
- Global Quantum Computing Market Growth at a CAGR of 35.12 ... - PR Newswire (press release) [Last Updated On: June 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 30th, 2017]
- Qudits: The Real Future of Quantum Computing? - IEEE Spectrum - IEEE Spectrum [Last Updated On: June 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 30th, 2017]
- New method could enable more stable and scalable quantum ... - Phys.Org [Last Updated On: June 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 30th, 2017]
- Quantum computers are about to get real | Science News - Science News Magazine [Last Updated On: June 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 30th, 2017]
- Quantum Computing - Scientific American [Last Updated On: June 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 30th, 2017]
- Australia's ambitious plan to win the quantum race - ZDNet [Last Updated On: July 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 3rd, 2017]
- How quantum mechanics can change computing - The Conversation - The Conversation US [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2017]
- UNSW joins with government and business to keep quantum computing technology in Australia - The Australian Financial Review [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2017]
- UNSW launches Australia's first hardware quantum computing company with investments from federal and NSW ... - OpenGov Asia [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2017]
- Finns chill out quantum computers with qubit refrigerator to cut out errors - ZDNet [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2017]
- Hype and cash are muddying public understanding of quantum ... - The Conversation AU [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2017]
- IEEE Approves Standards Project for Quantum Computing ... - insideHPC [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2017]
- Silicon Quantum Computing launched to commercialise UNSW ... - ZDNet [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2017]
- The Era of Quantum Computing Is Here. Outlook: Cloudy ... [Last Updated On: January 30th, 2018] [Originally Added On: January 30th, 2018]
- The Era of Quantum Computing Is Here. Outlook: Cloudy | WIRED [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2018] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2018]
- Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2018] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2018]
- What is quantum computing? - Definition from WhatIs.com [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2018] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2018]
- Quantum computers - WIRED UK [Last Updated On: February 19th, 2018] [Originally Added On: February 19th, 2018]
- Is Quantum Computing an Existential Threat to Blockchain ... [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2018] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2018]
- What is Quantum Computing? Webopedia Definition [Last Updated On: March 25th, 2018] [Originally Added On: March 25th, 2018]
- Quantum Computing Explained - WIRED UK [Last Updated On: April 15th, 2018] [Originally Added On: April 15th, 2018]
- Quantum computing: A simple introduction - Explain that Stuff [Last Updated On: June 2nd, 2018] [Originally Added On: June 2nd, 2018]
- What are quantum computers and how do they work? WIRED ... [Last Updated On: June 22nd, 2018] [Originally Added On: June 22nd, 2018]
- How Quantum Computers Work [Last Updated On: July 22nd, 2018] [Originally Added On: July 22nd, 2018]
- The reality of quantum computing could be just three years ... [Last Updated On: September 12th, 2018] [Originally Added On: September 12th, 2018]
- The 3 Types of Quantum Computers and Their Applications [Last Updated On: November 24th, 2018] [Originally Added On: November 24th, 2018]
- Quantum Computing - VLAB [Last Updated On: January 27th, 2019] [Originally Added On: January 27th, 2019]
- Quantum Computing | Centre for Quantum Computation and ... [Last Updated On: January 27th, 2019] [Originally Added On: January 27th, 2019]
- Microsofts quantum computing network takes a giant leap ... [Last Updated On: March 7th, 2019] [Originally Added On: March 7th, 2019]
- IBM hits quantum computing milestone, may see 'Quantum ... [Last Updated On: March 7th, 2019] [Originally Added On: March 7th, 2019]
- Quantum technology - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2019] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2019]
- Quantum Computing | D-Wave Systems [Last Updated On: April 18th, 2019] [Originally Added On: April 18th, 2019]
- Microsoft will open-source parts of Q#, the programming ... [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2019] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2019]
- What Is Quantum Computing? The Complete WIRED Guide | WIRED [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2019] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2019]
- The five pillars of Edge Computing -- and what is Edge computing anyway? - Information Age [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2019]
- Moore's Law Is Dying. This Brain-Inspired Analogue Chip Is a Glimpse of What's Next - Singularity Hub [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2019]
- Experts Gather at Fermilab for International Workshop on Cryogenic Electronics for Quantum Systems - Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2019]
- Princeton announces initiative to propel innovations in quantum science and technology - Princeton University [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2019]
- Detecting Environmental 'Noise' That Can Damage The Quantum State of Qubits - In Compliance [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2019]
- Quantum Computing beginning talks with clients on its quantum asset allocation application - Proactive Investors USA & Canada [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2019]
- What is quantum computing? The next era of computational evolution, explained - Digital Trends [Last Updated On: October 1st, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 1st, 2019]
- IT sees the Emergence of Quantum Computing as a Looming Threat to Keeping Valuable Information Confidential - Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source [Last Updated On: October 23rd, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 23rd, 2019]
- More wrong answers get quantum computers to find the right one - Futurity: Research News [Last Updated On: October 23rd, 2019] [Originally Added On: October 23rd, 2019]