President Review: Camilla Nielssons Extraordinary Documentary Traces the Alleged Theft of an Election – Variety

Democrats, Camilla Nielssons superb 2014 documentary about the tortuous construction of Zimbabwes 2013 constitution, was most riveting as a snapshot of a country still trying democracy on for size, wary of what it saw in the mirror. Studying the troubled coalition government that paired president Robert Mugabes long-ruling ZANU-PF party with the more liberal opposition of Morgan Tsvangirais Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) Alliance, Nielssons film posited any progress at all as fragile, easily undone by a volatile political system: Audiences might have left hoping for a more optimistic sequel, but hardly counting on one.

Even so, those who havent checked any headlines from Harare in the interim could hardly be prepared for the gut-punch of President, Nielssons galvanizing, epic-scale docuthriller tracking Zimbabwes corruption-riddled 2018 presidential election presented here as a brazen feat of hijacked democracy to make Donald Trump positively chartreuse with envy. As it premieres in Sundances world documentary competition, President may hit especially hard with audiences who have recently become all too familiar with talk of stolen elections as it depicts a scenario in which such accusations are backed by disturbing numeric discrepancies rather than wounded ego and bluster.

Not that Nielssons film panders to international viewers with hand-holding commentary or comparisons. Like Democrats, it is free of narration and direct talking heads, instead relying on the passive but insistent presence of Nielsson and DP Henrik Bohn Ipsens camera to navigate us through a thorny obstacle course of rallies, protests, procedural meetings and, in an urgent and heart-sinking final act, full-blown courtroom drama. Only a hefty 133-minute running time might give distributors some pause, but while President presents certain opportunities for judicious cutting, its never less than gripping, and will likely reach more eyeballs than its predecessor.

The film begins with a dramatic change of guard in both Zimbabwes main political parties, following the 2017 coup that saw veteran dictator Mugabe ousted by his own party, and replaced with his former vice Emmerson Mnangagwa. Less than three months later, Tsvangirais untimely death from cancer sees 40-year-old lawyer and activist Nelson Chamisa take over as MDC chief. With the next general election already set for that July, its a baptism of fire for the charismatic young Turk, who nonetheless brashly sets out his plan to break ZANU-PFs stranglehold on power: He wants to rule us with his walking stick? he says of Mnangagwa, to whoops of approval at an early electoral rally.

MDC brass believe they have the lions share of public support; they also know that wont necessarily translate to the official vote count, in a country that has previously been plagued by allegations of electoral fraud and rigging by the ruling party. Moreover, the opposition has a tetchy relationship with the supposedly impartial Zimbabwean Electoral Commission, responsible for carrying out the election and delivering the result. The filmmakers sit in on fraught conciliatory conferences between ZEC and party officials, which make for some of the films tensest, wittiest material as accusations of unfairness are volleyed back and forth: Rather like Frederick Wiseman, Nielsson has a knack for excavating savage drama from administrative process and politesse.

Away from airless meeting rooms and onto the sidewalk, a national mood of hostility is more pronounced. MDC supporters claim theyre being abused and intimidated by the authorities as aggressive an election-stealing tactic as any possible number-fudging though as one rally attendee remarks, not everyone can be suppressed into submission when theyre already failed by the system. Whether were beaten up or we die of hunger, were dead anyway, she shrugs.

These words rather haunt the film when a horrifying climax is reached and filmed, with astonishing in-the-moment access in the days immediately following the election. As ZEC inexplicably delays the announcement of the results, to the consternation of the MDC and a restless public, mass protests are met with military fire, leaving six dead and many others wounded; who ordered this rash action is a question that Mnangagwa coyly sidesteps. The more the process is protracted, meanwhile, the more heavily the beleaguered, death-threatened Chamisas earlier words weigh on him: If we miss this opportunity, we are doomed for life.

Working on a larger and (even) more logistically challenging canvas than in Democrats, Nielssons filmmaking maintains its poise and intelligence whether negotiating procedural banalities or frenzied panic in the streets. Along with Ipsen and editor Jeppe Bdskov, she devotes as much attention to conflicted faces and layered human exchanges as she does to dry facts, while sheer circumstance gifts the film with scenes as extravagantly absurd and unnerving as anything that could be scripted. A surprise press conference with the bruised, resentful Mugabe might not have Shakespearean levels of grandeur and gravitas, but is captivating precisely because the disgraced leader believes it does: Politics consistently creates its own tragedy and comedy, and this vital, devastating documentary knows when simply to stand in the crowd.

Read this article:
President Review: Camilla Nielssons Extraordinary Documentary Traces the Alleged Theft of an Election - Variety

Related Posts

Comments are closed.