After eleven days of virtual and in-person screenings, partying, and celebrating independent filmmakers, the 48th Seattle International Film Festival closed on Sunday with a morning awards ceremony and an evening gala. In the afterglow of our individual festing, the SunBreaks SIFF team gathered on the internet to debrief on this years event.

Tony: If I had one of those little paper ballots representing my overall SIFF 2022 rating, Id make a solid tear through the 4. I think the hybrid models a great look on the festival, and I hope it was a successful strategy for fest organizers. It helps that I liked/loved pretty much everything I saw.

Josh: I didnt see nearly as much of it as I wanted to but, Im glad to have SIFF back, really appreciated the hybrid approach, and think that the earlier time of year and ten-day running time are as welcome as its long overdue return.

Chris: I agree with what you said, Josh. I didnt catch as many films as I wouldve liked but I really enjoyed the hybrid approach with most of the movies available on streaming throughout the festival. I wouldnt have minded an extra week or two like pre-Covid SIFF but it was enjoyable and well-run.

Morgen: Yes, I definitely would have loved another week to catch a few more in-theater-only screenings but really appreciated that there were so many films with the watch-at-home option. I ended up going to several in-person showings and only one film had more than a half-full theater (and most of the time it was more like one-third), but I kind of loved having all that space. Which film brought out the masses you ask? Marcel the Shell with Shoes On.

Chris: I knew Marcel the Shell with Shoes On was going to be one of my big regrets that I just couldnt fit into my schedule but what Morgen and Josh said afflicted me with massive levels of FOMO. Its two screenings conflicted with the Seattle Storms first preseason game Saturday evening and the Golden Space Needle Awards brunch Sunday morning.

Tony: As per usual, I didnt catch nearly as many films as Id hoped. And while the condensed festival run was appreciated, it also made for fewer weekend binges, which meant fewer opportunities for a working stiff to catch up on sought-after screenings. Im with you regarding the not-capacity audiences at the in-person screenings, Morgen. I do cherish the energy of a full theater, but it was also nice being able to distance myself from the plague-ridden masses in a theater.

Jenn: I ended up prioritizing in-person-only showings with the rationale its streaming so I can watch that anytime later, but with the result that I didnt even log into my virtual streaming account until the last day. Whoops! I heard that the Cleveland International Film Festival recently did a week of in-person screenings, FOLLOWED BY a week of virtual screenings, which feels like a genius idea, rather than forcing the choice. But anyway I had a really great time and was so happy to be back out in the mix with my cinephile pals and seeing so many great movies once again!

Chris: Im going to abstain from giving out my own Golden SunBreak trophy this year only because there were so many gaps of what I could actually get to that it feels woefully incomplete.

Josh: I missed it at a few other festivals, but damn it if that one-eyed, one-inch tall shell didnt get me this time around. Dean Fleischer Camps Marcel the Shell With Shoes On was every bit as cute as advertised, but was also guttingly melancholic. Adorable stop-motion animation as a conduit for meditations on isolation, mortality, abandonment, and balancing the hope of finding more with the fear of winding up with much less. It was almost too intense for ninety minutes.

Tony: Is Marcel the Shell with Shoes On officially fully-SunBreak approved? Because I likewise enjoyed it enormously. That said, there were three movies that rose to the top of a very rewarding SIFF 2022 for me. One of them was a doc (more on that later), but my favorite narrative features of the fest both bowled me over so thoroughly that Id really have to flip a coin to choose the better one.

Morgen: This is actually a tough pick for me this year, there were a few standouts and I was able to see a decent number of films despite the truncated timeframe and my full-time job. I credit the ability to stream many of the features, and Im thankful SIFF offered this option again. But lets get down to business, I can narrow it down to two: Hit The Road and Everybody Hates Johan. Both were quirky and light-hearted with a subtle underlying heaviness that gave each story the gravity to make them memorable. The former was particularly silly and wonderful, as a family takes a roadtrip with a veiled purpose that slowly unravels as they move through the desert to their destination. Tugging at your heartstrings the whole way, a barely-out-of-toddlerdom boy donning a sassy mouth chats, crawls and loves all over his brother and parents while the adults discuss more important matters of which hes utterly oblivious. It doesnt have a happy or sad ending, but life simply moves forward. As an aside, Im completely on-board with Joshs pick as well. I had my doubts, but Marcel ripped my guts out and put them back in a couple times; bravo Jenny Slate.

Tony: Peter Stricklands become one of my favorite modern filmmakers, and to my mind his batting average runs so solid, Id figured his latest, Flux Gourmet, would click for me. But I was not prepared for how great it wassharply satirical (and howlingly funny), visually spellbinding, peerlessly acted by a cast running on all eight comedic cylinders, and packed with symbolism as rich and resonant as it was (occasionally, at least) bluntly gross. My other favorite SIFF 2022 narrative was Warm Blood, Rick Charnoskis narrative fictional feature debut about a teenager living in relative poverty in modern-day Modesto, CA. Its an exhilarating burst of ragged energy that oscillates between verite grittiness, deadpan humor, moments of surprising beauty, and a stinging sociopolitical voice. Hoping to do a deeper dive on these, and the rest of the features I saw for the fest, in a post later this week.

Jenn: Here to add to the avalanche of praise for Marcel the Shell: definitely my favorite feature I watched during this fest. Ive been a fan of that adorable shell since his inception (I even own the book!!), and was a little skeptical about fleshing the hit-Youtube-shorts concept out with a feature-length emotional backstory, but Im totally agreed with the chorus here: they absolutely knocked it out of the park. If Im including films I didnt watch over these past 11 days but had seen in previous fests, theres another clear winner for me, though, which is Cha Cha Real Smooth (previously reviewed by Josh at Sundance). Cooper Raiffs follow-up to Shithouse (one of my honorable mentions among my Best of 2020) builds on that debuts promise to deliver an achingly human story of a twentysomething growing up. It would be easy to make a version of a film thatd fit this ones description which would make my eyes roll so far back into my head that theyd get stuck there (and this guy sure is a master of choosing titles that do not fit the tone of his films), but somehow Raiff avoids those pitfalls to bring a refreshingly, deeply honest and sweet perspective to the screen. Its really lovely.

Josh: Didnt really see enough to have a vote, but Im sure that if I hadnt already seen it elsewhere this would be Navalny for me. I will mention Buffalo Soldiers: Fighting On Two Fronts, which played as part of the Northwest Connections program. The short documentary, illuminating the contradictions and complexities of newly-freed slaves joining the US Army after the Civil War because it provided their most credible shot at pursuing the American Dream, at times felt like concisely produced content that would be at home accompanying a museum exhibit. However, the thorny issues it raised and the groundbreaking characters it introduced were so fascinating that I hope it is spun off into a limited series, with sixty minutes per episode instead of for the whole film, maybe more just for the Seattle-based re-enactors who keep these pieces of American history in living memory.

Chris: I am torn on this between Sweetheart Deal and The Pez Outlaw, because I thought both were well made and compelling but theyre so different from each other. The Pez Outlaw is the one Id rather watch a second time because it isnt quite as heavy but it could be a coin flip.

Tony: I only saw two docs, but because it gives me the opportunity to choose two Personal Bests of the Fest, I shall join Joshs chorus of one in singing the praises of Navalny, a stunningly well-directed and consistently riveting bit of work that felt like a gene-splice of paranoid thriller, Hollywood romance, and historic dramawith hearty snifters of Dr. Strangelove and The Three Stooges spiking the punch. And its all real.

Chris: Im going to offer a slight dissent, but I wasnt as taken with the opening night film Navalny as some of you were. I enjoyed it and respect its mission but I liked it more than I loved it. I really wished I got more of a sense of what Alexei Navalny actually believes, beyond that Putin and corruption are bad. Navalny had some pretty odious political beliefs before becoming such a prominent figure. The documentary brushes aside that he spoke at some extremist marches but I wish there was more of an interrogation of that. Even though I think it was an embarrassing episode for the human rights organization, and my liberalism demands that I not want right-wing dissidents illegally detained any more than I want left-wing dissidents illegally detained, Navalnys past statements and identity as a Russian nationalist caused Amnesty International to temporarily stop referring to him as a Prisoner of Conscience. Would this movie be so well-received if the viewers were told about past statements that could most charitably be called very racist that hes yet to repudiate and continues to host on his YouTube channel?

Josh: All very valid, and thorny points. Its easy to get swept up in the spycraft and image-making in Navalny. I appreciated that the filmmakers hinted at his more controversial positions, but agree that they mightve pushed harder to get at what he really believes and just hoe many compromises hes willing to make in service of the essential goal of shaking his country free from a dictatorship.

Morgen: I was only able to catch one documentary this time, Framing Agnes, so I dont feel qualified to say best. I enjoyed the film, and I liked that they were breaking the fourth wall a lot by re-enacting pivotal moments from a bygone era, but also catching discussion between the director/interviewer and the re-enactors about their personal experiences and thoughts on what happened to the folks they were emulating. It started to fall apart for me a bit about halfway through, but I still enjoyed it.

Jenn: I thought all four of the docs I managed to see were great, but if Im choosing one, its Cat Daddies. Im not sure if Ill be able to step back and assess the objective quality of this documentary about cats and the men that love them, but it just made me feel so good while watching it that I cant help but glow. I dont know if Ive ever so consistently had a smile on my face for a films entire runtime like that. Plus they offered photo opps with a guy in a mascot-style cat head, and I got a free cat mask to take home, so yeah, I loved it.

Chris: I was fond of Maika Monroe in Watcher, a Romanian thriller. The movie wasnt the most unpredictable, but her performance of an American wife newly alone in Bucharest while her husband is away at work is marvelous. She really conveys the paranoia and the loss of herself in a new place while feeling stalked by a creepy neighbor.

Tony: If I could give out a single Golden Sunbreak to Best Ensemble, Id bestow that honor to The Innocents, writer/director Eskil Vogts quiet but very effective slow-burn about psychic kids working out their issues. All four child actors at the center of the movie delivered remarkable, unaffected performances. But for the big prize, Ill single out Laura Galns performance as a put-upon, bullied teenage girl in Piggy, another terrific European indie chiller. The role starts out flirting close to caricature, but by the end, Galns conveyed adolescent longing, petulance, unbridled anger, and conflicted empathy with equal fidelity. Great as it is, the movie wouldnt be 1/100th as effective without her performance at the center.

Josh: Im giving this one to Gwendoline Christie in one of your favorites Flux Gourmet if only for holding it together and relishing an array of increasingly absurd costume decisions. Shes the mad queen at the center of that farce and the whole thing falls apart if she breaks.

Morgen: I have two for this as well. Marina Redepovi of The Staffroom was engrossing. As the newly-hired high school counselor Anamarija, she subtly and slowly succumbed to the tension and stress building in her over the entire film, grinding away at her positivity like sandpaper. Caring too much can be painful, but in the end you find a reason to stay. The other has to be Adle Exarchopoulos of Zero Fucks Given. While the film was in the middle of the pack otherwise, Adle was mesmerizing as a young stewardess Cassandre living the life, jet setting from one town to the next. As we got to know her and see the slow vice that closes in from little-to-no sleep, a lot of alcohol and stress from home, the burn-out was inevitable. Party girl may be what she wants for now, but we find out that all the traveling is just Cassandre running from something that will always haunt her until she faces it. Working toward a better life is only possible if she faces her past.

Jenn: I was also particularly impressed by Laura Galn, Maika Monroe, and Gwendoline Christie. But to throw my attention on a film we havent mentioned yet in this piece, I loved Karen Gillan in Riley Stearns Dual (previously reviewed by Chase at Sundance). She plays two different roles Sarah and Sarahs Double and manages to make them feel like very different people, even though theyre a person and that persons clone. That takes an admirable level of talent, and she pulls it off.

Documentary: Radiograph of a Family (Firouzeh Khosrovani)

New Directors: Lonely Voices (Andrea Brusa, Marco Scotuzzi)

New American Cinema: Know Your Place ( Zia Mohajerjasbi)

Ibero-American: Sublime (Mariano Biasin)

Documentary1. The Territory (Alex Pritz)2. Sweetheart Deal (Elisa Levine and Gabriel Miller)*3. Kaepernick & America (Tommy Walker and Ross Hockrow)4. Skate Dreams (Jessica Edwards)5. Daughter of a Lost Bird (Brooke Pepion Swaney)

* Lena Sharpe Persistence of Vision Award

Top Documentaries1. Jazz Fest: A New Orleans Story (Frank Marshall, Ryan Suffern)2. Navalny (Daniel Roher)3. Young Plato (Neasa N Chianin, Declan McGrath)4. Sweetheart Deal (Elisa Levine and Gabriel Miller)5. The Territory (Alex Pritz)

Josh: Not sure whether its meaningful, but only one of each of the top five audience favorites were from outside the USA. Maybe this means a good crop of American films, locals boosting locals, or people not being in the mood for subtitles at home. Either way, its great to see some of the local films getting recognition! Nothing wrong with a little hometown pride, particularly when its for Zia Mohajerjasbis gorgeously photographed and insightful odyssey set in Seattle. I caught The Territory at Sundance and am not at all surprised that Alex Pritzs story, made in collaboration with indigenous people in the disappearing Amazon rainforest, also connected with SIFF audiences.

And as always, the overlaps between the marathon film-goers, the juries, and the general public are interesting maybe were not so different after all!

Tony: Whether its some strange superpower/curse or not, I very seldom end up seeing movies that become the winners of the SIFF/Golden Space Needle/Audience Awards during the festival. That means I have very little skin in the game here. But Ill go out on a limb and say that the Fool Serious voters anointing Jazz Fest: A New Orleans Story with the Best Documentary award over Navalny has me scratching my head. Im sure Jazz Fest is a perfectly serviceable music doc (no, I havent seen it), but I cant comprehend it holding a candle to Daniel Rohers absorbing study of Alexei Navalnys battle of words and images against the current Russian regime.

Josh: My guess is that its a matter of access and priorities. Navalny screened only on opening night, to people with a special gala ticket; so its possible that passholders and audiences alike waited for it to come to CNN. With so many options available only during the festival, I cant say that I blame people for waiting a bit longer.

Along those lines, I thought I had covered my bases by seeing almost all of the Official Competition. That program always hits a nice balance of challenging and rewarding while giving a survey of the breadth of the festival as a whole, but I admit a personal failing in procrastinating and never watching the jurys pick: Klondike. I have no doubt about the jurys assessment: For a work both tragically prophetic and universal in its impact, a ferocious and formalist vision of war that fuses humanism, black comedy and horror into a searing and original vision. Still, film festivals are a matter of timing and serendipity, and I confess that I was never quite in the right frame of mind to sit down for two hours of Maryna Er Gorbachs raw and current tale set on the lonely border of Ukraine and Russia in the natural resource-rich Donetsk District, following pregnant Irka and her husband as their self-sufficient life is threatened by encroaching civil war.

Morgen: I didnt end up reviewing it for SXSW, but The Blind Man Who Didnt Want to See Titanic was a great story. The cinematography was wonderful, using camera angles, focus and lighting to put the viewer in the shoes of the main character. You wanted it to be more heartwarming, but being sequestered to a wheelchair, stuck in your house and the vulnerability of being blind arent a walk in the park individually, much less all together. Im actually on board with the top narratives in the Golden Space Needle competition which almost never happens. As for the passholders I agree with a couple of their choices but otherwise theyre middle of the road at best. Im still annoyed that both SIFF and SXSW Film viewers have all but ignored Linoleum. Jim Gaffigan is stellar, but the entire cast really meshes with a unique, heartfelt and thoughtful script to lead the way and Im disappointed no one else is saying so.

Josh: I suppose thats the great and frustrating thing about film festivals. Everyones on their own journey, sometimes great things get missed, and consensus forms unexpectedly. But theyre also an opportunity to find something great and advocate for your favorites throughout the year.

With that in mind, lets bring another season of SIFF to a close. I know we have some more reviews to roll out in the afterglow; so we can look forward to hearing about other gems (or duds, it happens!) discovered during this years festivities!

Keep up with us during the Seattle International Film Festival on Twitter (@thesunbreak) and follow all of our ongoing coverage via our SIFF 2022 Index andour SIFF 2022 posts

See the rest here:

SIFF 2022: That's a Wrap! Roundtable. - The SunBreak