The Rapid Evolution of the Media and Entertainment Industry: Navigating Digital Transformation – TV Technology

The media and entertainment industry is experiencing a period of rapid change. The market predictions for 2024 underscored the ongoing volatility in the media industry. We have already seen continued layoffs and potential declines in revenue from consumer experiences. The impact of industry strikes and organizational changes, such as Paramount's potential sale and upcoming cost restructuring, highlights the uncertainty and instability facing the sector. Despite occasional recoveries, the long-term effects of these disruptions require strategic planning and adaptability.

Over the past five years, the media supply chain, encompassing content preparation, distribution, and business workflows, has seen substantial shifts. Initially, organizations approached cloud technologies with caution, but now there's a widespread desire to leverage the immense power and flexibility offered by cloud solutions. While the potential benefits of cloud adoption are considerable, the journey can be fraught with challenges. Organizations must bring their teams along this journey, managing a spectrum of reactions from excitement to fear and confusion.

The transition to cloud-based environments is a critical focus for the vendor community, with major players like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure leading the charge. Navigating multi-cloud environments and understanding the associated cost structures is critical. One of the significant challenges in cloud adoption is managing egress chargesthe costs associated with transferring data out of cloud environments. Major cloud providers are beginning to alleviate these costs to facilitate smoother transitions between platforms. As more content moves to the cloud, internal data transfers become more efficient and less costly. Organizations must strategically manage their data, considering factors like storage, transfer, and processing costs to optimize their cloud environments.

Companies must rethink their approaches to digital transformation and cloud integration. There's a tendency to chase the latest technological trends, such as artificial intelligence (AI), without a clear strategic framework, often leading to a fools errand. This phenomenon is not new; it mirrors historical transitions, such as the move from tape-based to file-based workflows. In such transitions, organizations often make superficial changes without rethinking the underlying processes. Effective digital transformation requires new skill sets and a reconfiguration of team dynamics to fully leverage new technologies.

Organizations need to focus on adopting best practices that foster collaboration and efficiency. This includes consolidating similar tasks across teams, providing visibility into available content for sales, and rethinking organizational structures. These practices help reduce friction in the supply chain and optimize resource utilization, ultimately enhancing the overall effectiveness of media operations.

The restructuring of the media workforce and the consolidation of roles are key trends. It drives a need for a unified interface that sits across the increasingly complex ecosystem that makes up the modern digital supply chains. Tools that enhance collaboration across departments and provide visibility and consistency in workflows and the various business constituents. By streamlining communication and reducing friction, organizations can improve efficiency and effectiveness in their operations, ultimately driving cost savings put another way achieving exponential growth without exponential cost.

CFOs and finance organizations have become more educated and involved in technology solutions and often can make it feel like a shift in power dynamics within media organizations. There is a greater amount of financial scrutiny and the need for better control over expenditures that may have been loosened in recent years. The urgency of content production, localization, and participation in the streaming wars during the pandemic led to rapid decisions and actions. However, as the industry stabilizes, the focus is returning to financial control and strategic planning. There is an important balance to be maintained, ensuring that technological innovation and financial stability go hand in hand.

An important aspect of this latest transformation has to do with the economic conditions that the industry and the economy, as a whole, is experiencing. Where there was previously a desire to fully embrace an operational expenditure (Opex) model, we have seen a return to exploring and favoring capital expenditure (Capex) models. While Opex models offer advantages like reduced upfront costs and greater flexibility, they also present challenges, especially as businesses struggle to maintain EBITDA targets. Organizations need to balance these financial models, considering the extended lifecycle of tools and software, which often last well beyond the traditionally accepted three-year depreciation period.

We emphasize a comprehensive approach that focuses on navigating the evolving landscape of digital transitions, cloud strategies, and sales strategies, offering critical insights into both current trends and future directions while harnessing the power of the latest tools to achieve a balanced, efficient operational framework. As the industry continues to evolve, the ability to adapt and innovate will be crucial for sustained success.

[Editors note: In a Q&A with TV Tech's Phil Kurz, Shenkler discusses this fast-paced technological evolution, how it is changing the dynamic within media organizations when it comes to setting strategic direction with regards to technology and workflow and what to expect as these ongoing transitions accelerate. The video is available below.]

See the rest here:

The Rapid Evolution of the Media and Entertainment Industry: Navigating Digital Transformation - TV Technology

Posted in Uncategorized

The Evolution of Marketing From Product-Centric to Human-First [Infographic] – MarketingProfs.com

Marketers have traditionally focused on selling products and services by using highly polished messaging.

However, over the past decade they've increasingly embraced lo-fi, authentic content and experiences.

An infographic (below) from Giraffe Social explores the shift from product-centric to human-first marketing.

It looks at how social media influencers sparked this revolutionand how your marketing can adapt to the changes.

The rest is here:

The Evolution of Marketing From Product-Centric to Human-First [Infographic] - MarketingProfs.com

LA Kings Unveil Brand Evolution | Business – Milton Daily Standard

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Original post:

LA Kings Unveil Brand Evolution | Business - Milton Daily Standard

Populations are genetically different, and meaningfully so Why Evolution Is True – Why Evolution Is True

This is just a preview for my half-hour talk at the CSICon meeting in Las Vegas this October, where Ill talk about some of the distortions of biology created by ideology, distortions summarized in my Skeptical Inquirer paper coauthored with Luana Maroja.

Below is one slide Im using to address the misguided claim (one made by the top editors of the Journal of the American Medical Association), that Race and ethnicity are social constructs, without scientific or biological meaning.

Now the definition of race, as we discuss in our paper, is slippery, so we prefer to use ethnicity or geographic populations, but the implication is the same (read the paper before you kvetch): the claim is that there are no meaningful genetic differences between geographically separated populations.

But if that were the case, then you couldnt identify peoples ancestry from their genes. But we can: with good accuracy! If your genetic endowment said nothing about your ancestry, then companies like 23andMe would go out of business. And the fact that this works shows that ethnicity, or ancestry, or geographic population, or race, if you want to use the term, are not simply made-up social constructs, but indeed have important and often near-diagnostic genetic differences.

One example is me. Heres a slide Im going to show at CSICon. Its the 23andMe readout of my ancestry, with 97.2% of my genes coming roughly from the dark green area on the map. Im 100% Jewish, and mostly Ashkenazi.

That matches with what I know of my ancestry, and so my genetic endowment is surely of biological significance. The data from my genome, as analyzed by 23andMe, tells me something about the history of the genes I carry. Apparently, I have not a single nucleotide that isnt Jewish!

At any rate, come to the meeting. It features much bigger fish like Neil deGrasse Tyson and Brian Cox, and for sure it will be a good time, as its going to be similar in spirit and content to James Randis Amazing Meetings, which were great.

The rest is here:

Populations are genetically different, and meaningfully so Why Evolution Is True - Why Evolution Is True

Evolution of Zelda: How Hyrule’s princess went from damsel in distress to central hero – The National

For the first time, Zelda will be the main playable character of a game.

Nintendo revealed its latest slate of coming titles during a showcase on Tuesday. One of the biggest announcements was for a new game in the Legend of Zelda series, Echoes of Wisdom.

Apart from the cutesy aesthetic, which is a contrast to recent games in the series, Echoes of Wisdom will allow players to play as Zelda throughout for the first time.

The Legend of Zelda series, to the confusion of many parents and non-gamers over the years, traditionally features a character named Link as its main protagonist. The titular Zelda is Princess Zelda, whom the young adventurer Link attempts to rescue in most of the games.

Princess Zelda is a central figure in the series, having evolved significantly since her debut in 1986. Initially portrayed as a damsel in distress, her character has grown into a multifaceted and occasionally playable role, reflecting broader trends in video game storytelling and character development.

Heres a look through the characters evolution leading to her own game Echoes of Wisdom, which is set for release on September 26 on the Nintendo Switch.

Princess Zelda first appears in The Legend of Zelda (1986) as the titular character Link's primary motivation: to rescue her from the evil Ganon.

The portrayal sets the archetype of Zelda as a princess in need of rescue, a common trope in early video game narratives. Throughout the NES and SNES console eras, she remains a largely passive figure, appearing briefly at the beginning and end of games to drive the plots forward.

In The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998), Zelda disguises herself as a seemingly male character named Sheik who is part of the Sheikhah clan, a shadow folk who serve to protect her. The character of Sheik is not revealed to be Zelda until the end of the game, shrouding her in mystery.

In The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker (2002), Zelda takes on the alter ego of Tetra, a swashbuckling pirate captain. This interpretation emphasises her adventurous spirit and leadership qualities outside her royal role, further expanding her character beyond a mere princess.

Wii-era Twilight Princess (2006) and Skyward Sword (2011) continue to deepen her characterisation, presenting her as a more proactive and integral figure in Link's journey.

From The Legend of Zelda: Spirit Tracks (2009), she takes on more directly playable roles. In this game, she assists Link by possessing phantoms and directly aiding in puzzles and combat, showing her capabilities beyond being a passive character.

In Hyrule Warriors (2014) and its sequels, Zelda is a playable character, wielding magic and combat skills alongside Link and others in fast-paced action gameplay. These spin-off games provide a taste of what she can do as well as the special abilities she possesses.

In The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild (2017), Zelda's character undergoes a profound evolution. As the game's narrative unfolds, players witness a vulnerable yet determined character struggling with her destiny as the princess and her duty to the kingdom of Hyrule.

Her story arc in this game emphasises her growth, wisdom and the burden of her royal lineage, presenting her as a complex and fully realised character.

The Legend of Zelda series has been experiencing a surge in popularity after the release of the last two games, Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom. The series won over a new generation of fans, with more becoming interested in the lore and origins of each character.

With the release of Echoes of Wisdom, players will be able to experience the story of a character who has, despite her development, mostly been relegated to cut scenes and minor contributions. From the trailer shown during the showcase, Zeldas main weapon will be a staff that can generate copies of items and creatures.

Using this magical staff, she will be able to traverse levels and combat enemies to reach the goal of the game rescuing Link. The turning of the tables in this game illustrates Nintendo's creative attempts to subvert expectations and give new purpose to its most famous characters.

Updated: June 19, 2024, 2:04 PM

See the original post here:

Evolution of Zelda: How Hyrule's princess went from damsel in distress to central hero - The National

Live coverage: SpaceX swaps Falcon 9 boosters ahead of Starlink launch from Cape Canaveral Spaceflight Now – Spaceflight Now

A Falcon 9 stands ready for a Starlink mission at Cape Canaverals pad 40. File photo: Adam Bernstein/Spaceflight Now.

SpaceX is preparing to launch its first Starlink mission from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in more than two weeks. The last time the company attempted to launch the Starlink 10-2 mission, it encountered a rare scrub as the Falcon 9s first stage Merlin engines began firing.

Liftoff of the rescheduled flight is set for 1:15 p.m. EDT (1715 UTC) from Space Launch Complex 40.

Spaceflight Now will have live coverage beginning about an hour prior to liftoff.

Activity in the tropics creates some uncertainty for the launch from a meteorological perspective. On Saturday, June 22, the 45th Weather Squadron issued a launch weather forecast that suggests just 50 percent odds of favorable launch weather at the opening of the launch window. That deteriorates to just 20 percent by the close of the window. Meteorologists are tracking cumulus clouds, anvil clouds and lightning probability as primary concerns.

Deep tropical moisture will remain entrenched across the Florida peninsula into early next week, and as a result, scattered to numerous showers and thunderstorms can be expected each day, largely favoring the afternoon and evening hours, the forecast stated.

While atmospheric flow will remain weak enough to allow daily seabreeze development, an incoming trough will likely result in delayed formation and westward progression by Monday and Tuesday, with initial storm development closer to the coast on those days.

The 24-hour back-up launch opportunity is generally the same, but the opening of the launch window is 60 percent favorable for liftoff.

The Falcon 9 first stage booster supporting this mission, B1078, will be launching for an 11th time. It previously launched the astronauts and cosmonaut of the Crew-6 mission, the USSF-124 mission and seven previous Starlink flights.

A little more than eight minutes after liftoff, B1078 will land on the SpaceX droneship, A Shortfall of Gravitas. This will be the 75th booster landing for ASOG and the 321st booster landing to date.

However, B1078 wasnt always the intended booster for this mission though. The original flight plan had B1073 as the first stage booster. However, the booster was swapped out following a last-second scrub on June 14.

SpaceX hasnt elaborated on the issue or issues that caused the scrub during engine ignition, but in a June 15 post on X (formerly Twitter), Kiko Dontchev, the vice president of Launch at SpaceX said: Tough week dealing with production challenges and then a rare scrub at engine startup yesterday on 10-2. Unfortunately there is a real issue so we need to go inspect the hardware in detail on this vehicle Painful, but safety and reliability are the priority.

This will be the 45th launch of Starlink satellites so far in 2024 with another planned for Sunday evening, which is set to launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base at 8:45 p.m. PDT (11:45 p.m. EDT, 0345 UTC).

Starlink 10-2 will add another 22 satellites to the growing megaconstellation. Following the launch, SpaceX will have launched 1,007 Starlink satellites this year alone.

According to expert orbital tracker and astronomer, Jonathan McDowell, there are more than 6,000 active Starlink satellites on orbit.

While SpaceX is preparing to launch a pair of Falcon 9 rockets on both sides of the country, in Florida, its also working with NASA and the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to launch a new weather satellite on June 25 at 5:16 p.m. EDT (2116 UTC).

NASAs Launch Services Program (LSP) contracted SpaceX to launch the final satellite in the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites-R (GOES-R) series. NOAA describes these as the Western Hemispheres most sophisticated weather-observing and environmental-monitoring system.

In an interview with Spaceflight Now on Friday NASAs launch director, Dr. Denton Gibson, said the launch team will be monitoring the weather over the next few days.

We have some planning to do or decisions to make in terms of when we roll the vehicle out and before we do all of our final preps for launch, Gibson said.

He said they would make a determination on whether a rollout of the Falcon Heavy rocket from the hangar to the pad would make more sense on Sunday or Monday.

The Falcon Heavy has a backup launch date of June 26, but if it slips beyond that, Gibson said there would need to be discussions with the Eastern Range before a new date could be booked.

Watch live views of the Falcon Heavy launch pad.

Read more here:

Live coverage: SpaceX swaps Falcon 9 boosters ahead of Starlink launch from Cape Canaveral Spaceflight Now - Spaceflight Now

Rocket Lab successfully launches its 50th Electron rocket Spaceflight Now – Spaceflight Now

A close-up shot of the nine Rutherford engines at the base of Rocket Labs Electron rocket. The flight marked the 50th launch of Electron since its debut in 2017. Image: Rocket Lab

Rocket Lab successfully reached a milestone that few commercial rockets achieved and at a pace that outperformed its competition. The company launched its 50th Electron rocket to date just seven years after the vehicles debut in May 2017.

The instantaneous liftoff from Launch Complex 1 at New Zealands Mahia Peninsula happened at 6:13 a.m. NZST on Friday, June 21 (2:13 p.m. EDT, 1813 UTC on Thursday, June 20).

Onboard the rocket were five satellites on behalf of France-based internet of things company, Kinis. This was the first of five dedicated flights for the company to deploy its full constellation, consisting of 25 satellites. All five on this flight were successfully deployed.

The satellites will orbit at an inclination of 98 degrees with the five satellites deploying in a precise sequence in singles and as pairs to build out the constellation exactly as Kineis needs it, according to Rocket Lab.

The launch for Rocket Lab comes at a busy time for the business, which is pushing towards becoming an end-to-end space company. That includes multiple upcoming missions for U.S. agencies, like the National Reconnaissance Office and the U.S. Space Force as well as preparing for a planetary mission to Mars with Blue Origins New Glenn rocket as the ride to space.

Prior to Electrons 50th launch, Sir Peter Beck, the founder and CEO of Rocket Lab, said he and his team are immensely proud of reaching this milestone in the time that they did.

Out of all the commercially developed rockets in the world, Electron reaching 50, we did it in the fastest amount of time. So, we scaled faster to 50 than anybody else, faster than the Falcon 9, faster than Pegasus, faster than anything else commercially, Beck said. And thats a really hard thing to do because whether its a giant rocket or a little rocket, the scaling element is the same and its super, super hard.

Beck said much of the Electron rockets flying today are quite similar to the rockets that kicked off their orbital launch business. He said in addition to their successes, theyve also taken away a great deal from their failures as well.

I prefer not to think about it because theyre such devastating moments. Theyre incredibly painful. And yes, its true that after those moments, you build a better vehicle, Beck said. But I always remind the team to never, never be happy, because if youre happy, the rocket gods will come down with a baseball bat and let you know whos in charge.

So, were always striving to improve the vehicle. Every opportunity we can to improve it or make it more reliable, we take. And its just the harsh reality of spaceflight: its incredibly difficult.

He noted that they are continuing to book more and more Electron flights each year as they progress with the program and prepare to bring the larger and reusable Neutron rocket to market by mid-2025. But he said their pace of launch will continue to be driven by customer demand.

Any CEO is going to say say that they want to see it scale vertically, right? The reality is, we scale with our customer demand. And the customer demand changes all the time, depending on geopolitical circumstances, where people are at in building their constellations and all the rest of it, Beck said.

What I will say is, this year, we sold more Electrons than weve ever sold before and next year is shaping up to be the same. So, we certainly hope that the scaling continues for the product, but its purely driven by market demand.

Follow this link:

Rocket Lab successfully launches its 50th Electron rocket Spaceflight Now - Spaceflight Now

SpaceX launches 20 Starlink satellites on Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Station Spaceflight Now – Spaceflight Now

A stack of SpaceX Starlink satellites, which included the first six featuring Direct to Cell capabilities. The batch launched on the Starlink 7-9 mission, which lifted off from Vandenberg Space Force Base on Jan. 2, 2024. Image: SpaceX

Update 12:09 a.m. EDT: SpaceX launches the Starlink 9-1 mission.

SpaceX launched a Falcon 9 rocket Tuesday evening, following the scrub of a planned mission for satellite communications company, SES, from Florida. SpaceX sent another batch of its Starlink satellites to low Earth orbit, which included another 13 with direct to cell (DTC) capabilities.

Liftoff from Space Launch Complex 4 East (SLC-4E) at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California happened at 8:40 p.m. PDT (11:40 p.m. EDT, 0340 UTC). This marked the 20th orbital launch from California in 2024 so far.

The Falcon 9 first stage booster supporting this mission, tail number B1082 in the SpaceX fleet, launched for a fifth time. It previously supported the launches of the United States Space Force-62 (USSF-62) mission and three Starlink flights.

A little more than eight minutes after liftoff, B1082 is set to land on the SpaceX droneship, Of Course I Still Love You. It marked the 93rd booster landing on OCISLY and the 319th overall booster landing.

Despite an unusually long period without launches (between June 8 and June 18), SpaceX is still confident that it will hit or exceed its orbital launch goals this year.

In a statement on X (formerly Twitter), Jon Edwards, SpaceXs vice president of Falcon Launch Vehicles, said We still have a good shot at 148. In fact, we may even try to do a few more this year.

See the original post here:

SpaceX launches 20 Starlink satellites on Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Station Spaceflight Now - Spaceflight Now

NASA moves Starliner landing to June 26 to collect more test flight data Spaceflight Now – Spaceflight Now

Boeings Starliner spacecraft photographed through the window of SpaceXs Crew Dragon capsule while both were docked to the International Space Station. Image: NASA

Boeings leak-prone Starliner capsule will remain docked to the International Space Station an additional four days, NASA announced Tuesday, returning to Earth with a pre-dawn landing at White Sands, New Mexico, on June 26 to close out an extended 20-day test flight, the first with astronauts aboard.

The additional docked time will give Starliner commander Barry Butch Wilmore and co-pilot Sunita Williams more time to help out aboard the station while flight controllers and engineers continue scrutinizing telemetry and finalizing plans for re-entry with five known helium leaks in the capsules propulsion system and unexpected, presumably now-resolved issues with multiple maneuvering jets.

One jet will not be used for the remainder of the flight, but the other suspect thrusters were successfully hot fired during a test Saturday, giving managers confidence they will work as needed for post-undocking maneuvers and to drop the Starliner out of orbit for re-entry and landing.

As for the helium leaks, engineers say the spacecraft has more than seven times the amount needed for the remainder of the flight. During the hot-fire test Saturday the leak rates were less than what telemetry indicated earlier in the mission, but engineers are still assessing data to better understand the behavior of the system.

Weve learned that our helium system is not performing as designed. Albeit manageable, its still not working like we designed it, said Mark Nappi, Boeings Starliner program manager. So weve got to go figure that out.

As for the thrusters, theres some things about our flight profile and/or our parameters where our thrusters arent performing (as expected). So weve got to go figure that out. But he said Boeing intends to fully eliminate both issues, which he described as nuisances, before the Starliner flies again.

The good thing about the situation, he said, is that we can stay up on ISS a little bit longer and get as much data as we possibly can so that we can fully understand this to the best of our ability.

In the meantime, Steve Stich, NASAs Commercial Crew Program manager, said the Starliner can safely carry Wilmore and Williams back to Earth as is if some issue crops up that requires an immediate departure.

But as it now stands, Wilmore and Williams will undock from the space stations forward port at 10:10 p.m. EDT on June 25 and fire the ships aft-facing thrusters to drop out of orbit early the next day, setting up a parachute-and-airbag-assisted landing at White Sands, N.M., at 4:51 a.m. EDT.

The day before Wilmore and Williams depart, ISS astronauts Tracy Dyson and Mike Barratt plan to venture outside the station for a spacewalk, or EVA, to retrieve a faulty radio transmitter and to collect swabs near vents and the stations airlock to find out if any microorganisms have managed to make it outside and survive in the harsh environment of space.

During an initial attempt June 13, in what was to have been the first of three planned spacewalks, Dyson and Matthew Dominick, her original partner, never got out of the airlock. Dominick reported a spacesuit discomfort issue, and the EVA was called off.

Rather than take the time to investigate and correct the problem with Dominicks suit, and given the amount of airlock oxygen available, NASA managers decided to re-try the original spacewalk with Dyson and Barratt and to combine tasks planned for the second and third outings in a single excursion on July 2.

But the spacewalk schedule is dependent on the Starliner undocking, which is the top near-term priority.

Already running four years behind schedule, the Starliner was launched June 5, a month later than planned due to problems with its Atlas 5 rocket, trouble with a countdown computer and because of an initial helium leak in the system used to pressurize the capsules thrusters.

NASA and Boeing managers decided the leak was too small to pose a safety threat and the ship was cleared for launch. Once in orbit and on the way to the space station, however, four more helium leaks developed and the Starliners flight computer took seven maneuvering jets off line when the telemetry did not match pre-launch expectations.

Stich said the hot-fire test Saturday showed the jets needed for post-undocking maneuvers and the critical de-orbit burn will work as needed to take the ship out of orbit for re-entry. Likewise, he said engineers were confident the helium leaks can be managed even if one or more gets worse after undocking.

But the additional days docked with the space station will give engineers more time to review data and monitor telemetry from the Starliners service module, which is where the thrusters and the helium pressurization plumbing are located. Engineers will not be able to study the actual hardware because the service module is discarded prior to re-entry and will burn up in the atmosphere.

Were taking extra time given that this is a crewed vehicle, we want to make sure that we havent left any stone unturned, Stich said. We also want to look at the systems and potential interaction between the systems and make sure we havent missed something before we return.

I like the fact that the vehicle is staying a little longer. I like the fact that were watching how the vehicle performs thermally, how the space station charges the batteries. Were getting to see those kinds of cycles, which we absolutely need for the subsequent missions. So I think theres a silver lining in staying a little (longer at the space station).

Before launch, NASA managers had hoped the Starliner test flight would pave the way toward certifying the spacecraft for operational space station crew rotation missions starting early next year. But given the problems encountered earlier in the flight, certification could be delayed depending on what is required to address the issues identified to date.

Read the rest here:

NASA moves Starliner landing to June 26 to collect more test flight data Spaceflight Now - Spaceflight Now

SpaceX launches SES’s Astra 1P television satellite following two weather scrubs Spaceflight Now – Spaceflight Now

Following two weather scrubs in as many days, SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on the SES Astra 1P mission from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. Image: Adam Bernstein / Spaceflight Now

Update 6:53 p.m. EDT: SpaceX deployed the Astra 1P satellite.

The third time turned out to be the charm for SpaceX as it was able to launch the Astra 1P satellite to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) on behalf of one of its oldest customers: Luxembourg-based SES. The mission came after two weather-related launch scrubs in a many days.

The Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from pad 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 5:35 p.m. EDT (2135 UTC) on Thursday, June 20.

The Falcon 9 first stage booster supporting this mission, tail number B1080 in the SpaceX fleet launched for a ninth time. It previously supported the launches of two private astronaut missions for Axiom Space (Ax-2 and Ax-3), the European Space Agencys Euclid observatory and four Starlink missions.

About 8.5 minutes after liftoff, B1080 landed on the SpaceX droneship, Just Read the Instructions. This made the 84th booster landing for JRTI.

The launch snapped a rare stretch of almost 13 days without a Falcon 9 launch from Cape Canaveral, although two launches have occurred from the companys West Coast launch pad at Vandenberg in that time.

Following the last-second abort the Starlink 10-2 launch attempt on Friday, Kiko Dontchev, the Vice President of Launch at SpaceX, wrote on X (formerly Twitter): This will be the first week weve gone without a Falcon Launch in a long time. Unplanned downtime due to weather or unexpected issues happens, its how we respond that matters. The launch business takes grit and when things go wrong, our true form comes to life. Bring it on!!!

Onboard the SpaceXs 62nd Falcon 9 launch of 2024 was the Astra 1P satellite, which is also referred to as SES-24. The Luxembourg-based telecommunications company is a long-time customer of SpaceXs launch services.

In fact, the first payload that a Falcon 9 launched to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) was SES-8 on Dec. 3, 2013 on the seventh of the rocket.

The Astra 1P satellite continues a legacy of television satellites in the Astra 19.2E group that goes back to Astra 1A, which launched in 1988. There are currently four satellites in use within this orbital position: Astra 1KR, Astra 1L, Astra 1M and Astra 1N.

Astra 1KR and Astra 1L were manufactured by Lockheed Martin, while Astra 1M and Astra 1N were built by Astrium (now Airbus Defene and Space). In 2021, SES contracted Thales Alenia Space to manufacture Astra 1P and Astra 1Q.

Both Astra 1P and Astra 1Q will feature direct-to-home (DTH) functionality, but the latter will also be customizable on orbit and can be deployed easily to other orbital positions.

Our prime TV neighborhood at 19.2E is one of our most valuable assets and has been key to enabling renowned European broadcasters to grow their TV audiences in the last 30 years. These two satellites will have the resiliency, reliability and redundancy that our video customers need, and will be able to deliver continued premium services well into 2040, said Steve Collar, the former CEO of SES, in a 2021 statement. Additionally, thanks to advanced satellite technology, we will be future-proofing our investment and injecting a high degree of flexibility into ASTRA 1Q to ensure we are meeting the evolving needs of all the markets we serve.

Prior to launch, in a recorded statement, Adel Al-Saleh, the current CEO of SES, said Astra 1P is designed to replace the four satellites currently stationed at the 19.2E position.

This satellite will serve some of our largest media customers, like Sky, Canal+, Telefnica and RTL to deliver the valued, high quality content to their customers, Al-Saleh said. And it will also address the growing demand of sports and events, so that customers, like the NFL and various football leagues, can easily distribute their content across Europe.

View original post here:

SpaceX launches SES's Astra 1P television satellite following two weather scrubs Spaceflight Now - Spaceflight Now

55 Years Ago: One Month Until the Moon Landing – NASA

With the dress rehearsal completed during Apollo 10 in May 1969, only a few weeks remained until Apollo 11, the actual Moon landing mission to meet President Kennedys goal set in 1961. Apollo 11 astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Edwin E. Buzz Aldrin and their backups James A. Lovell, William A. Anders, and Fred W. Haise entered the final phase of their training, rehearsing their mission in simulators and practicing for the lunar surface activities. Teams in Mission Control supported the simulations. A successful countdown demonstration cleared the way to start the actual countdown leading to launch. In the Pacific Ocean, U.S. Navy and NASA teams prepared for the recovery of the astronauts returning from the Moon, and for their postflight quarantine.

Apollo 10

After returning from their successful Moon landing dress rehearsal mission on May 26, 1969, Apollo 10 astronauts Thomas P. Stafford, John W. Young, and Eugene A. Cernan passed on their knowledge and lessons learned to the Apollo 11 Moon landing crew during postflight debriefs. On June 8, they accepted Emmy Awards on behalf of all Apollo crews for their television broadcasts from space, with special recognition for Apollo 10s first use of color TV in space. On June 19, Stafford, Young, and Cernan returned to NASAs Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida to thank the employees there for getting them safely into orbit. On June 30, President Richard M. Nixon hosted them and their wives at a White House black tie dinner in their honor.

Left: Apollo 10 astronauts debrief their mission with the Apollo 11 astronauts. Middle: Apollo 10 astronauts John W. Young, left, Eugene A. Cernan, and Thomas P. Stafford hold their Emmy Awards. Right: At NASAs Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida, Stafford, left, Young, and Cernan hold photographs of their launch presented to them by KSC Launch Director Rocco A. Petrone.

Apollo 10 astronauts Thomas P. Stafford, left, John W. Young, and Eugene A. Cernan wave to employees as they ride in a convertible through NASAs Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Apollo 11

The document from NASAs Office of Manned Space Flight stating Apollo 11s primary objective.

On June 26, Samuel C. Phillips, Apollo Program Director, and George E. Mueller, Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C., signed the directive stating Apollo 11s primary objective: perform a manned lunar landing and return. The focus of the crews training, and all the other preparatory activities happening across the agency, aimed at accomplishing that seemingly simple, yet in truth extremely complex and never before accomplished, task.

Left: Apollo 11 astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, left, and Edwin E. Buzz Aldrin in the Lunar Module simulator at NASAs Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida. Right: Apollo 11 astronaut Michael Collins in KSCs Command Module simulator.

Apollo 11 Flight Directors Eugene F. Kranz, left, Glynn S. Lunney, Clifford E. Charlesworth, Milton L. Windler, and Gerald D. Griffin pose in Mission Control.

The final weeks leading up to the launch of their historic mission proved quite busy for Apollo 11 astronauts Armstrong, Collins, and Aldrin and their backups Lovell, Anders, and Haise, as well as the ground teams preparing their rocket and spacecraft for flight. To train for the different phases of their mission, the astronauts conducted many sessions in Command Module (CM) and Lunar Module (LM) simulators at both the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC), now NASAs Johnson Space Center in Houston, and at KSC. For many of these sessions, teams of operators in MSCs Mission Control monitored their activities as they would during the actual mission. Flight Directors Eugene F. Kranz, left, Glynn S. Lunney, Clifford E. Charlesworth, Milton L. Windler, and Gerald D. Griffin led the Mission Control teams.

Apollo 11 astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, left, and Edwin E. Buzz Aldrin practice their lunar surface activities at the Manned Spacecraft Center, now NASAs Johnson Space Center in Houston, left, and at NASAs Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Apollo 11 would conduct the first spacewalk on another celestial body and only the second spacewalk of the Apollo program. At training facilities at MSC and KSC, Armstrong and Aldrin practiced setting up a television camera that would relay their activities back to Earth during the 2.5-hour excursion, deploying the three science experiments, and collecting rock and regolith samples for return to Earth.

Left: Apollo 11 Commander Neil A. Armstrong prepares to fly the Lunar Landing Training Vehicle (LLTV) at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston. Middle: Armstrong airborne in the LLTV. Right: Apollo 11 backup Commander James A. Lovell following a flight in the LLTV.

On June 6, NASA managers approved the resumption of astronaut training flights in the Lunar Landing Training Vehicle (LLTV) at Ellington Air Force Base (AFB) near MSC. The LLTV simulated the flight characteristics of the LM and astronauts used it to train for the final 200 feet of the descent to the lunar surface. Managers reached the decision after reviewing findings from the Review Board headed by astronaut Walter M. Schirra that investigated the Dec. 8, 1968 crash of LLTV-1 as well as results from flights in LLTV-2 made by MSC test pilots Harold E. Bud Ream and Jere B. Cobb. Between June 14 and 16, Armstrong flew LLTV-2 eight times to complete his training program with the vehicle. He had previously completed 12 simulated Moon landings in the LLTV and its predecessor, the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV), narrowly escaping the crash of LLRV-1 in May 1968. Backup Commander Lovell completed four flights in the LLTV between June 19 and July 1. Armstrong, Aldrin, Lovell, and Haise also practiced landings in the Lunar Landing Research Facility (LLRF) at NASAs Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia.

Left: Senior NASA managers monitor the Apollo 11 Countdown Demonstration Test (CDDT) in Firing Room 1 of the Launch Control Center at NASAs Kennedy Space Center. Right: The team of controllers in Firing Room 1 monitor the Apollo 11 CDDT.

Left: Apollo 11 astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, front, Michael Collins, and Edwin E. Buzz Aldrin about to board the transfer van to Launch Pad 39A for the Countdown Demonstration Test (CDDT). Middle: Workers in the White Room assist Collins, left, Armstrong, and Aldrin to enter their spacecraft for the CDDT. Right: Armstrong, left, Aldrin, and Collins leave Launch Pad 39A at the conclusion of the CDDT.

At KSC, engineers completed the three-day Flight Readiness Test on June 6, ensuring the flight readiness of the Saturn V rocket and the Apollo spacecraft perched on Launch Pad 39A. On June 17, top managers from NASA Headquarters and the Directors of MSC, KSC, and the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, held the Flight Readiness Review at KSC. The meeting reviewed all aspects of readiness for the launch and mission, clearing the way for the next milestone, the Countdown Demonstration Test (CDDT). The CDDT, a full dress rehearsal for the actual countdown to launch, consisted of two parts. The wet test, conducted from June 27 to July 2, included fueling the rocket as if for flight, with the countdown stopping just prior to first stage engine ignition, and did not involve the flight crew. The dry test followed on July 3, an abbreviated countdown without fueling the rocket but with the astronauts boarding the CM as if on launch day. Controllers in Firing Room 1 of the Launch Control Center at Launch Complex 39 monitored all aspects of the CDDT as they would for an actual countdown. The successful test cleared the way for the start of the launch countdown at 8 p.m. EDT on July 10, leading to launch on July 16.

The three commemorative items carried aboard Apollo 11. Left: The Lunar Flag Assembly. Middle: The stainless steel commemorative plaque. Right: The silicon disc containing messages of goodwill from world leaders.

On July 2, NASA announced that Armstrong and Aldrin would leave three symbolic items behind on the Moon to commemorate the historic first landing an American flag, a commemorative plaque, and a silicon disc bearing messages from world leaders. The astronauts would plant the three-by-five-foot flag near their LM during their spacewalk. The stainless steel plaque bore the images of the two hemispheres of the Earth and this inscription,

HERE MEN FROM THE PLANET EARTH

FIRST SET FOOT UPON THE MOON

JULY 1969 A.D.

WE CAME IN PEACE FOR ALL MANKIND

The signatures of the three astronauts and President Richard M. Nixon also appeared on the plaque. Workers mounted it on the forward landing leg strut of the LM. The one-and-one-half-inch silicon disc contained messages of goodwill from 73 world leaders, etched on the disk using the technique to make microcircuits for electronic equipment. The crew placed the disc on the lunar surface at the end of their spacewalk.

Left: Apollo 11 astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, left, Edwin E. Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins hold a copy of the commemorative plaque they will leave behind on the Moon and their mission patch. Right: The Apollo 11 astronauts in the glass-enclosed room at the Lunar Receiving Laboratory.

During a July 5 press conference in the MSC auditorium, the Apollo 11 astronauts revealed the call signs for their spacecraft. They named their CM Columbia and their LM Eagle. We selected these as being representative of the flight, the nations hope, said Armstrong. Columbia served as a national symbol represented by a statue atop the Capitol in Washington, D.C. They named the LM after the symbol of the United States, the bald eagle, featured on the Apollo 11 mission patch. In a second event, the astronauts answered reporters questions from inside a glass-enclosed conference room at MSCs Lunar Receiving Laboratory (LRL). After their mission, the returning astronauts completed their 21-day quarantine in the LRL to prevent any back contamination of the Earth by any possible lunar microorganisms.

NASAs Johnson Space Center in Houston, workers simulate the arrival of the first Moon rocks and other items returned from Apollo 11. Middle: Workers practice docking the Mobile Quarantine Facility (MQF) with the LRL. Right: In Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, workers barge the prime and backup MQFs to load them onto the U.S.S. Hornet. Image credit: courtesy U.S. Navy.

At the LRL, other preparations for the return of the Apollo 11 astronauts from the Moon included a simulation of the arrival and processing of the Moon rocks and other items following the mission. The rocks, crew biological samples, and film would be flown from the prime recovery ship to Houston ahead of the crew. Engineers and technicians also rehearsed the arrival of the crew with a dry run of docking a Mobile Quarantine Facility (MQF) to the LRLs loading dock. Following the test, workers loaded two MQFs, a prime and a backup, onto a cargo plane for transport to Hawaii and loading onto the prime recovery ship.

Left: Workers in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, prepare to lift a boilerplate Apollo Command Module onto the U.S.S. Hornet for splashdown and recovery rehearsals. Image credit: courtesy U.S. Navy Bob Fish. Middle: Crews from the U.S.S. Hornet practice recovery operations. Right: Recovery team members dry their Biological Isolation Garments aboard the U.S.S. Hornet following a recovery exercise.

On June 12, the U.S. Navy notified NASA that it had selected the U.S.S. Hornet (CVS-12) as the prime recovery ship for Apollo 11 to undertake the most complex recovery of an astronaut crew. The same day, with Hornet docked in her home port of Long Beach, California, its commanding officer, Capt. Carl J. Seiberlich, held the first recovery team meeting to review the Apollo Recovery Operations Manual, written by MSCs Landing and Recovery Division. Between June 12 and 25, Hornet onloaded NASA equipment required for the recovery. On June 27, Hornet left Long Beach for a three-hour stop in San Diego, where air group maintenance and support personnel embarked. The next day, after Hornet left for Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, pilots flew the aircraft required to support the recovery onto the carrier. During the cruise to Pearl Harbor, Hornets 90-man team detailed for Apollo 11 recovery operations held numerous meetings and table-top simulations. After arriving in Hawaii on July 2, workers loaded a boilerplate Apollo capsule onto the aircraft carrier to be used for recovery practice. The NASA recovery team, the Frogmen swimmers from the U.S. Navys Underwater Demolition Team 11 (UDT-11) who assisted with the recovery, and some media personnel arrived onboard. For the recovery operation, Capt. Seiberlich adopted the motto Hornet Plus Three, indicating the goal of a safe recovery of the three astronauts returning from the Moon. On July 3, Capt. Seiberlich introduced the 35-member NASA recovery team to the Hornets crew. Donald E. Stullken, Chief of the Recovery Operations Branch at MSC and inventor of the inflatable flotation collar attached by swimmers to the capsule after splashdown, led the NASA team. His assistant John C. Stonesifer oversaw the decontamination and quarantine operations. Stullken and Stonesifer briefed Hornets Command Module Retrieval Team on all events associated with the recovery and retrieval of an Apollo capsule and its crew. On July 6, workers loaded the two MQFs aboard Hornet. The prime MQF would house the returning astronauts, a flight surgeon, and an engineer from shortly after splashdown until their arrival at the LRL in Houston several days later. The second MQF served as a backup should a problem arise with the first or if violations of quarantine protocols required additional personnel to be isolated. Along with the MQFs, Navy personnel loaded other equipment necessary for the recovery, including 55 one-gallon containers of sodium hypochlorite to be used as a disinfectant. Between July 7 and 9, the Hornet conducted nine Simulated Recovery Exercises in local Hawaiian waters. Lieutenant Clarence J. Clancy Hatleberg led the team as the designated decontamination swimmer with U.S. Navy Frogmen serving as stand-ins for the astronauts, all wearing Biological Isolation Garments as they would on recovery day. The Hornet returned to Pearl Harbor to pick up the rest of the NASA recovery team before setting sail on July 12 for its first recovery position.

Apollo 12

Left: Apollo 12 astronauts Charles Pete Conrad, left, Alan L. Bean, and Richard F. Gordon prepare to enter their Command Module for an altitude test. Right: Conrad after completing a flight in the Lunar Landing Training Vehicle.

Left: In the Manned Spacecraft Operations Building (MSOB) at NASAs Kennedy Space Center, workers finish attaching the landing gear to the Apollo 12 Lunar Module (LM). Middle left: Workers in the MSOB prepare to mate the Apollo 12 Command and Service Modules with the Spacecraft LM Adapter. Middle right: Workers move the assembled Apollo 12 spacecraft from the MSOB to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB). Right: In the VAB. workers lower the Apollo 12 spacecraft onto its Saturn V rocket.

With Apollo 11 on its launch pad, workers continued to prepare Apollo 12 for its eventual journey to the Moon, targeting a September launch should Apollo 11 not succeed. If Apollo 11 succeeded in its Moon landing mission, Apollo 12 would fly later, most likely in November, to attempt the second Moon landing at a different location. In KSCs Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), the three-stage Saturn V stood on its Mobile Launcher, awaiting the arrival of the Apollo spacecraft. In the nearby Manned Spacecraft Operations Building, the Apollo 12 prime crew of Charles Pete Conrad, Richard F. Gordon, and Alan L. Bean and their backups David R. Scott, Alfred M. Worden, and James B. Irwin completed altitude chamber tests of the CM and LM during the first two weeks of June. Workers removed the spacecraft from the vacuum chambers, mated them on June 27, and transferred them to the VAB on July 1 for stacking on the Saturn V rocket. At Ellington AFB in Houston, Conrad completed his first flights aboard LLTV-2 on July 9-10.

Apollo 13

Left: In the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASAs Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida, workers place the first stage of the Apollo 13 Saturn V rocket onto the Mobile Launcher to begin the stacking process. Middle: The Apollo 13 Command and Service Modules arrive at KSC. Right: The ascent stage of the Apollo 13 Lunar Module arrives at KSC.

In the event that neither Apollo 11 nor 12 succeeded in landing on the Moon, NASA stood prepared to try a third time with Apollo 13 in November or December, still in time to meet President Kennedys deadline. The Apollo 13 Command and Service Modules arrived at KSC on June 26, followed by the LM ascent and descent stages on June 28 and 29, respectively. The Saturn Vs S-IC first stage arrived on June 16 and workers placed it on its Mobile Launcher two days later. The S-IVB third stage and S-II second stage arrived June 13 and 29, respectively, and workers stacked the stages in mid-July.

To be continued

News from around the world in June 1969:

June 3 Eric Carle publishes childrens picture book The Very Hungry Caterpillar.

June 3 The final episode of Star Trek airs on NBC.

June 5 The Tupolev Tu-144 became the first passenger jet to fly faster than the speed of sound.

June 10 The Nixon Administration cancels the U.S. Air Force Manned Orbiting Laboratory program.

June 15 Hee Haw, with Roy Clark and Buck Owens, premieres on CBS.

June 20 Georges Pompidou sworn in as the 19th President of France.

June 20 200,000 attend Newport 69, then largest-ever pop concert, in Northridge, California.

June 23 Warren E. Burger sworn in as U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice.

June 28 Police carry out a raid at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village, New York, beginning the modern LGBT rights movement.

Read more from the original source:

55 Years Ago: One Month Until the Moon Landing - NASA

Computational model offers insight into the risks of space flight for people with heart failure – News-Medical.Net

Space exploration has always captivated our imagination, offering the promise of discovering new worlds and pushing the boundaries of human capability. As commercial space travel becomes more accessible, individuals with various underlying health conditionsincluding heart failuremay soon be among those venturing beyond Earths atmosphere. This raises critical questions about the impact of space travel on humans with potential underlying health problems. My recent research, Computational modeling of heart failure in microgravity transitions, delves into this issue, offering insights that could shape the future of space travel.

The demographic of commercial space travelers is shifting, increasingly including older, wealthy individuals who may not be in optimal health. Unlike professional astronauts, these space tourists typically do not undergo rigorous health screenings or physical training. This shift necessitates a broader consideration of health conditions, such as heart failure, diabetes, and other chronic illnesses, in space mission planning.

Heart failure alone affects over 100 million people globally. Traditionally, space medicine has focused on the effects of microgravity on healthy astronauts. However, the inclusion of non-professional astronauts with preexisting health conditions demands a deeper understanding of how microgravity impacts these individuals. The unique cardiovascular challenges posed by space travel could significantly affect heart failure patients, making this an essential area of study.

Furthermore, heart failure is not a uniform condition and can be broadly categorized into two types. One type involves a weakened heart that cannot pump blood effectively, while the other is characterized by the hearts inability to relax and fill properly. These differences mean that each type of heart failure presents unique challenges and must be studied separately to understand the specific risks and required countermeasures in a microgravity environment.

In the microgravity environment of space, the human body undergoes significant changes. One of the most notable effects is the redistribution of bodily fluids, causing what is commonly known as puffy face bird leg syndrome. Imagine a person with a swollen, puffy face paired with skinny, almost comically thin legslike a bird, whats in the name. This fluid shift results in reduced venous pooling in the legs and increased venous pressure in the upper body. For healthy individuals, the cardiovascular system can adapt to these changes, but for heart failure patients, the risks are substantially higher.

Given the lack of real-world data on heart failure patients in space, we turned to computational modeling to simulate the effects of microgravity. We used our previously published21-compartment mathematical model of the cardiovascular system. By tuning the parameters of this model, we were able to predict how heart failure patients might respond during space travel with a high degree of accuracy.

Our simulations revealed that entry into microgravity increases cardiac output in all individuals. However, for heart failure patients, this increase in cardiac output is accompanied by a dangerous rise in left atrial pressure, which can lead to pulmonary edemaa condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe.

Our research underscores the need for comprehensive health screenings and personalized medical plans for space tourists with underlying health conditions. As commercial space travel becomes more accessible, ensuring the safety of all passengers, especially those with chronic health conditions like heart failure, is paramount.

Moreover, our findings highlight the importance of further research into the long-term effects of space travel on cardiovascular health. Future studies should focus on the prolonged exposure to microgravity and the cumulative impact of comorbidities in heart failure patients.

One promising avenue for future research and safety in space travel is the development of human digital twins. A human digital twin is a highly detailed virtual model of an individual's physiological systems. By creating these digital replicas, we can simulate various scenarios and predict how different conditions, such as microgravity, might affect an individual's health. This approach allows for personalized risk assessments and tailored countermeasures.

For heart failure patients, a digital twin could simulate how their specific heart condition would respond to the stresses of space travel. This personalized model could help identify the most effective pre-flight preparations and in-flight interventions, thereby enhancing the safety and well-being of space tourists with heart conditions.

The dream of space travel is closer than ever, but with it comes the responsibility to understand and mitigate the health risks associated with this new frontier. Our computational modeling provides a critical step toward ensuring that space travel is safe for everyone, including those with heart failure. As we continue to push the boundaries of exploration, integrating advanced technologies like human digital twins will be crucial in protecting the health and well-being of all who venture into the final frontier.

Source:

Journal reference:

Read the original here:

Computational model offers insight into the risks of space flight for people with heart failure - News-Medical.Net

Boeing Starliner 1st astronaut flight: Live updates – Space.com

Refresh

Boeing and NASA have decided to delay the planned landing of its first Starliner astronaut test flight to no earlier than Wednesday, June 26, to allow "a little more time to look at the data" due to helium leaks and thruster issues on the spacecraft.

Starliner is now targeted to land at White Sands Space Harbor in New Mexico at 4:51 a.m. EDT (0951 GMT) on June 26, NASA officials said.

NASA and Boeing are holding a press conference now on Boeing's Starliner mission. You can listen live here:

NASA will talk about the delayed return to Earth of Boeing's Starliner capsule during a press conference today (June 18), and you can listen to it live.

NASA and Boeing representatives will discuss the progress ofStarliner's mission at theInternational Space Station(ISS), which docked June 6 after experiencing several helium leaks and issues with five onboard reaction control system (RCS) thrusters.

The press conference begins at 12 p.m. EDT (1700 GMT) and you can listen to it live here at Space.com, via NASA Television.

Read more: NASA and Boeing will discuss Starliner's delayed ISS departure today, and you can listen live

The departure of Boeing's Starliner spacecraft from the space station, with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams aboard, has been pushed back four more days, NASA announced Friday morning (June 14), in a blog post. Starliner's Crew Flight Test (CFT) is now set to return no earlier than (NET) June 22. The extra time, according to NASA, will allow mission teams to finalize departure details and continue to test the on-orbit capabilities of the spacecraft.

In the interim, CFT crew members Wilmore and Williams will perform additional checks on Starliner, including a "hot-fire" test of seven of the spacecraft's eight aft thrusters, hatch operations and "safe haven" drills to utilize Starliner in an emergency. NASA will hold a briefing Tuesday, June 18, to elaborate on Starliner's delay, flight status and landing details.

As NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams continue to run through planned systems checks of their Starliner spacecraft, the space agency is keeping a watchful eye on the capsule's helium leaks. One leak was detected before launch, but deemed minor enough to proceed with the mission. Now, since its time in space, Boeing's Starliner spacecraft has sprung four more helium leaks, though they have also been deemed not to pose a risk to the crew or spacecraft through its return window June 18. "Engineers evaluated the helium supply based on current leak rates and determined that Starliner has plenty of margin to support the return trip from station," NASA officials wrote in aCFT update on Monday(June 10).

Related: NASA weighs potential impacts of helium leaks and more on Boeing's Starliner astronaut test flight

The first crew flight test of the Boeing Starliner spacecraft will last a little longer than planned.

Starliner is currently docked at the International Space Station (ISS) while its crew, NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, are spending a week aboard the orbital lab testing out the new spacecraft and conducting scientific research in microgravity. A spacewalk planned for June 13 being performed by a different crew aboard the ISS would have overlapped with Starliner's originally scheduled departure time, so NASA has decided to push the mission's ISS departure to June 18.

"The additional time in orbit will allow the crew to perform aspacewalkon Thursday, June 13, while engineers complete #Starliner systems checkouts," NASA ISS officialssaid on Sunday(June 9) via X.

Read more: Boeing's 1st Starliner astronaut mission extended through June 18

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are starting their first full docked day at the International Space Station.

Among their tasks today is to unpack a new urine processing pump for a replacement, NASA officials said. The urine processor was a late addition to Starliner's cargo manifest after the unit on the space station failed earlier this month.

Wilmore and Williams will spend about eight days putting Starliner through a series of tests to help certify it for operational crew missions. "We're looking forward to staying here for a couple of weeks and getting all the things that we need to get done," Wilmore said during a welcome ceremony after Starliner's arrival on June 6.

Related: The ISS has a urine pump problem. Boeing's Starliner astronaut launch will flush it out.

About two hours following their successful docking, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were given the 'go' to open Starliner's hatch and enter the International Space Station. Wilmore and Suni opened the hatch from inside Starliner, and after some work to stow the spacecraft's hatch for egress, entered the ISS and were greeted by the ringing of a bell by the station's current crew as all seven members of Expedition 71 at 3:45 p.m. EDT (1945 GMT).

Boeing's Starliner spacecraft has docked to the International Space Station with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams. Soft capture occurred at 1:34 p.m. EDT (1734 GMT) with the forward docking port of space station's Harmony module. Starliner performed the docking autonomously. "At 12:34pm, Central time above the Indian Ocean, we have confirmation of contact and capture of NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test and Starliner aboard the International Space Station. Butch and Suni, have made their arrival," NASA commentators said on the space agency's live stream. A series of docking procedures will now take place as movement between Starliner and the space station dissipates. Starliner's hatch is expected to occur in about an hour, with a short welcome ceremony from the current ISS crew.

After a test fire of some of Starliner's reaction control system thrusters (RCS), NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are now moving toward the forward docking port of the space station's Harmony module. The spacecraft's original docking attempt was waved off after an anomaly in those thrusters was detected, and after troubleshooting, it was determined to be safe to proceed with docking. Starliner is currently being operated autonomously, and will remain in that configuration through docking.

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams have waved off the first docking attempt of their Starliner spacecraft with the Internationals Space Station, due to an anomaly with at least two of the spacecraft service module's reaction control thrusters. The earliest scheduled docking was set for 12:15 p.m. EDT (1615 GMT), but that window is no longer available. The next available window begins at 1:33 EDT (1733 GMT). As Starliner remains in a 'hold' position, station-keeping with the ISS at about 200 meters distance, the astronauts continue to fly the spacecraft in manual mode, before switching to an automated maneuvering system ahead of docking procedures.

Related: Boeing Starliner astronauts wave off 1st ISS docking attempt amid thruster issues

Starliner is currently station-keeping with the ISS at a distance of about 200 meters away. They do not currently have the 'go' to enter the space station's 'keep-out sphere' and proceed with the docking process, as they troubleshoot an issue with the spacecraft's reaction control system thrusters on the service module, which experienced an anomaly during the manual fly-around maneuver.

Flying autonomously, Starliner is completing a series of burns to reach the ellipsoid of the International Space Station (ISS) for proximity operations. This boundary is a four kilometer by two kilometer by a two kilometer invisible sphere around the ISS, which acts as a safety buffer for all incoming and departing spacecraft.

Once the spacecraft has executed an approach corridor initiation burn, it will hold at around 850 feet (260 meters) away from the space station for manual piloting demo. Following, docking is scheduled for 12:15 p.m. EDT (1615 GMT), at the station's forward-facing node-2 docking port.

It's docking day for Boeing's first Starliner astronaut mission with the spacecraft due to arrive at the International Space Station at 12:15 p.m. EDT (1615 GMT) with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams aboard.

The astronauts awoke from their first night in space at 4:30 a.m. EDT (0830 GMT), with Wilmore asking Mission Control for a status on two new helium leaks detected overnight in Starliner's propulsion system.

"We're kind of curious where we stand as far as our leaks. And if we could get a summary on that, that'd be wonderful," Wilmore radioed to the Mission Control

"The big picture that it currently creates is that are we are going to be able to support a rendezvous today," Mission Control's Capcom radioed back.

Flight controllers detected two additional helium leaks to one already known about in Starliner's propulsion system overnight and closed manifolds associated with them. Mission Control reports that all three manifolds should be reopened in time for docking.

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams are hard at work performing initial tests on the Starliner spacecraft in orbit as they head to the International Space Station.

Butch Wilmore is performing a series of manual flight control tests to see how Starliner handles under astronaut control. Boeing and NASA have about 85 different demonstrations and test to perform over the course of their one-week flight.

"It's really a big checkout day," Steve Stich, NASA's Commercial Crew Program manager, said in a statement. "And really ,the purpose of this is to learn we can about Starliner."

NASA chief Bill Nelson told reporters that Wilmore and Williams will test Starliner "from izzard to gizzard" during their mission. Space.com Spaceflight editor has the full story in our Starliner post-launch wrap up.

NASA is holding a live press conference now about Boeing's Starliner astronaut mission. You can watch it live on NASA TV here.

Also, NASA's Media Channel is showing a live mission coverage of Starliner's progress to the International Space Station. You can follow that live here.

Starliner has completed its orbital insertion burn, placing the spacecraft in a stable low-Earth orbit (LEO). Aboard, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are now on a coarse to rendezvous with the International Space Station (ISS), pending minor trajectory burns. Starliner is scheduled to dock with the ISS on Thursday (June 6) around 12:15 p.m. EDT (1615 GMT).

The Starliner spacecraft has successfully separated from the Centaur upper stage o its Atlas V rocket, a critical milestone for this Crew Flight Test mission.

The spacecraft is technically not in orbit yet. That milestone will come after an orbital insertion burn scheduled for about 30 minutes after liftoff, or about 11:22 a.m. ET

ULA's Atlas V rocket has jettisoned its first stage and is now flying under the power of two Centaur upper stage engines as it continues toward orbit.

The protective aeroskirt and docking port cover on the Starliner spacecraft have also been jettisoned. The rocket continues to perform as planned on the trip to space.

Here's more photos of the launch.

The Atlas V rocket carrying Boeing's first crewed Starliner spacecraft to orbit has jettisoned its twin solid rocket boosters as the rocket continues its uphill flight toward orbit.

Coming up next is main engine shutdown and first stage separation.

STARLINER AWAY! Boeing's first Starliner spacecraft to carry astronauts has lifted off atop a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket and is headed to space.

Liftoff occurred on time at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT).

The Launch Director for today's Boeing Starliner astronaut launch has conducted final GO-NO GO poll for today's launch and it is GO across the board. Starliner is again ready for launch. Just minutes remain before launch.

"Starliner, Go," Crew Flight Test commander Butch Wilmore said from inside the capsule during the test.

"We all know that when the going gets tough, as it often does, the tough get going, and you all have," Wilmore said. "Let's get going, let's put some fire in this rocket. "

"Let's go Calyspo, take us to space and back," pilot Sunita Williams said, referring to the name of the Starliner capsule.

The Crew Access Arm has been retracted clear of the United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket as the countdown progresses for today's Starliner astronaut launch at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT).

Starliner is now on internal power for the mission. So far, no issues have affected the launch countdown.

Boeing's 1st Starliner launch is now just over 10 minutes away. If you're along the U.S. souteastern coast of Florida's East Coast, you may be able to see the launch.

Here's a map of visibility for the Starliner Crew Flight Test launch atop a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket.

NASA, Boeing and United Launch Alliance are now less than 30 minutes to Boeing's first Starliner astronaut launch and all systems continue to perform well for today's launch at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT).

In Houston, NASA's Crew Flight Test director Mike Lamers is preparing to call for a Go-No Go poll to ensure Mission Control is ready for the flight. In Florida, ULA and Boeing's launch director are preparing for their own final poll in the remaining minutes before launch.

Boeing is now T-1 hour away and counting toward the launch of its first Starliner astronaut test flight for NASA at 10:52 am. EDT (1452 GMT).

The countdown has been smooth so far, with the weather continuing to look good for launch.

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams will spend 25 hours aboard Starliner after launch to reach the International Space Station. Once at the ISS, they'll spend about a week docked at the station performing tests on the spacecraft before returning to Earth for a land landing in the American Southwest. Check out this mission overview below.

The hatch to Boeing's Starliner Crewed Flight Test capsule has been closed for launch as the countdown continues for Boeing's historic first astronaut launch for NASA at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT).

Cabin pressurization is under way.

Boeing's Starliner close-out crew has fully strapped in NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams for today's launch at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT) from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida.

A weather briefing is under way ahead of hatch closure for the Starliner spacecraft. So far, weather has looked promising, with a pristine 90% chance of good conditions to launch.

Boeing's Starliner close-out crew is strapping NASA astronaut Butch Wilmore into the commander's seat of the Starliner Crew Flight Test capsule as the countdown continues for today's 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT) launch. Pilot Sunita Williams will follow Wilmore into the capsule from the White Room connected to the Starliner hatch shortly.

Starliner Crewed Flight Test astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams are headed to their Starliner Atlas V rocket launch pad at the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. The two astronauts walked out of NASA's Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building at the Kennedy Space Center with broad smiles, waves and roses as they bid farewell to friends and loved ones ahead of their flight.

Before leaving for the pad, Wilmore (Starliner's commander) and Williams (the pilot) did battle with NASA Chief Astronaut Joe Acaba (a teacher-turned-spaceflyer) in a series of games. By tradition, astronaut crews have to beat the chief astronaut at those games before leaving for the pad. They appeared to tackle trials of arm wrestling and Rock, Paper, Scissors for this go around.

Starliner's CFT mission will be the third career spaceflight for both Williams and Wilmore.

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams are suiting up for their launch on Boeing's Starliner Crewed Flight Test mission today from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT). Wilmore (commander) and Williams (pilot) are donning their blue Boeing-issue spacesuits in NASA's checkout buidling.

Meanwhile, United Launch Alliance has completed the fueling operations for the Starliner crew's Atlas V rocket. Currently, all systems are operating as expected with a 90% chance of good weather, with cumulus clouds posing the only potential threat to launch.

The ULA team has begun filing the Centaur upper stage with liquid oxygen. About 4,150 gallons of liquid oxygen will be loaded into the Dual Engine Centaur for its mission to accelerate Starliner to space.

Starliner is scheduled to launch today at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT). You can watch it here at Space.com, courtesy of NASA.

The first crewed mission aboard the Boeing Starliner spacecraft is proceeding towards launch on Wednesday (June 5) after a computer issue in the ground launch sequencer system scrubbed the previous launch attempt with just minutes left in the countdown.

"Teams at NASA and Boeing Space confirmed on Monday that the Starliner spacecraft, ULA Atlas V rocket, and ground support equipment are healthy and ready for the 10:52 a.m. ET June 5 launch of the agency's Boeing Crew Flight Test," NASA's Commercial Crew program wrote on X on Monday (June 3).

The U.S. Space Force's Space Launch Delta 45 has predicted a 90% chance of favorable weather at launch, which occurs at 10:52 a.m. ET (1452 GMT). Watch it live here courtesy of NASA.

Related: Boeing's 1st Starliner astronaut launch aborted minutes before liftoff (video)

Boeing's next attempt to launch its first Starliner astronaut mission will occur no earlier than June 5, NASA officials said this afternoon.

In an emailed statement to reporters, NASA said that the agency, Boeing and the United Launch Alliance will skip a launch opportunity on June 2 and await the next window on June 5. Liftoff is now set for Wednesday, June 5, at 10:52 a.m. EDT (1452 GMT).

"Saturday's launch was to carry NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to and from the International Space Station scrubbeddue to anobservation of a ground launch sequencer. The system was unsuccessful in verifying the sequencers necessary redundancy," NASA officials wrote in an update.

"NASA, Boeing, and ULA (United Launch Alliance) are forgoing a Crew Flight Test launch attempt Sunday, June 2, to give the team additional time to assess a ground support equipment issue at Cape Canaveral Space Force Stations Space Launch Complex-41 in Florida," NASA added. "ULA will assess the ground support equipment overnight, and NASA will provide an update June 2 on next steps for the flight.The next available launch opportunities are Wednesday, June 5, and Thursday, June 6."

Tory Bruno, CEO of the United Launch Alliance, told reporters that a faulty computer card appears to have led to today's Starliner launch abort minutes before liftoff. The card is in one of several computers that form the ground launch sequencersystem that governs the final phase of its Atlas V rocket countdown. Solving the problem may be as simple as just replacing the computer card, which can be done once pad crews can safely approach the pad after the Atlas V has been emptied of propellant and made safe, a process that will take several hours.

If the fix is that simple, then Starliner's next launch will be set for Sunday, July 2, at 12:03 p.m. EDT (1603 GMT), with NASA's livestream of the launch beginning around 8 a.m. EDT (1200 GMT). NASA's Steve Stitch said the agency will make an announcement later Saturday afternoon or evening on the launch plan.

Read this article:

Boeing Starliner 1st astronaut flight: Live updates - Space.com

NASA, Boeing delay Starliner astronaut landing to June 26 amid thruster issues – Space.com

The return to Earth of Boeing's Starliner capsule will be delayed a few more days due to thruster troubleshooting and a scheduled spacewalk.

NASA announced today (June 18) that Starliner will conclude its first human mission to the International Space Station (ISS) no earlier than June 26, nearly three weeks after it launched. Landing that day is scheduled to occur at White SandsSpace Harbor in New Mexico at 4:51 a.m. EDT (0851 GMT). We'll carry it live here at Space.com, via NASA Television.

The two-astronaut mission, known as Crew Flight Test (CFT), was originally supposed to spend about a week at the ISS, but its ISS departure has been pushed back considerably. NASA and Boeing are using the extra time to continue evaluating thruster issues that interfered with Starliner's first ISS docking attempt on June 6. Additionally, a postponed ISS maintenance spacewalk will now take place on June 24, two days before Starliner's scheduled departure.

"We want to give our teams a little bit more time to look at the data, do some analysis and make sure we're really ready to come home," Steve Stich, manager of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, said during a livestreamed teleconference with reporters today. Starliner can undock in case of emergency, but otherwise, testing is ongoing to learn more about the vehicle's systems.

Related: Thruster glitches and helium leaks can't stop Boeing's Starliner astronaut test flight but why are they happening?

Stich reiterated that five of Starliner's 28 reaction control thrusters failed during the final phase of the ISS rendezvous on June 6, though four of them eventually came back online. (Starliner succeeded on its second docking try, which occurred several hours later on June 6.) Evaluation of what happened is ongoing. As part of that effort, Boeing and NASA ground team members performed a thruster hot-fire test over the weekend alongside the astronauts, and, after that, Stich said, everyone "feels very confident."

One thruster was not fired during the test due to abnormally low pressure first observed during docking, and it will remain offline during the return to Earth. (Canadarm2, the robotic arm on the space station, was also used to view the thrusters via robotic camera, according to ISS Program Manager Dana Weigel, who also participated in the teleconference.)

Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

CFT's docking was a bit more complex than the only other time Starliner approached the ISS, which was done during an uncrewed test flight in May 2022. That uncrewed mission, called Orbital Flight Test 2 (OFT-2), also faced thruster issues that interfered with docking.

But "the rendezvous [for CFT] was a little bit more demanding on the propulsion system. In other words, it fired its thrusters a bit more frequently," Stich said. Additionally, teams are doing hardware simulations at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama to model ongoing helium leaks on Starliner.

A small helium leak in one of Starliner's reaction control system (RCS) thrusters was first discovered on the pad in early May, after a launch attempt was waved off due to a valve issue with the capsule's United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket.

Several new helium leaks arose during the mission, and a fault tree analysis is ongoing to find out what happened. Stich said the helium leaks and RCS thruster issues appear to have different causes, while Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager ofBoeing's commercial crew program, said data review is continuing to reveal more about what is happening.

The helium leak on the launch pad was not an immediate safety issue, but in investigating it further, NASA and Boeing uncovered a design vulnerability in the RCS system that could affect Starliner's reentry. Agency officials subsequently certified a new reentry mode after testing the idea on the ground in simulations with the CFT crew, veteran NASA astronauts Barry Wilmore and Suni Williams, both of whom are former U.S. Navy test pilots.

Wilmore and Williams have been testing Starliner's various systems in orbit, and ground teams have continued to analyze data to get a better handle on the thruster and helium-leak issues.

Stich emphasized that testing in orbit on Saturday (June 15) gave the team confidence that Starliner is recovering. "Saturday was a big day of understanding that helium leaks have gone down, and also understanding the thrusters have recovered, and that we can count on the thrusters for the remainder of the flight," he said.

Although evaluation of what is happening continues, he said the tone of the conversation has changed. "I think now we're doing the normal business we do of, What are the contingencies that could happen [with] the undock timeframe? And when we get to these, how we manage each of those contingencies, should something happen, and then look at the procedures we have in place. Are we ready to execute those?"

The delayed mission return also accommodates a planned June 13 spacewalk that was postponed due to a "spacesuit discomfort" issue during suit-up. NASA astronaut Matt Dominick, the ISS crew member experiencing discomfort, will not go outside during the rescheduled spacewalk on June 24 to prevent this from happening again, Weigel said during today's press conference.

Weigel told Space.com that, if the June 24 spacewalk is delayed again, Starliner's undocking would be the priority and spacewalking NASA astronauts Tracy Caldwell Dyson and Mike Barratt would wait until after Starliner leaves to perform the extravehicular activity.

CFT is a developmental mission. Throughout the launch and flight campaign, Boeing and NASA have emphasized that mission timelines are therefore very much in flux as Starliner flies its first-ever mission with humans on board. Wilmore and Williams said much the same, based on their experience with the U.S. Navy flying complex aircraft.

"We've always said this is a test flight, and we're going to learn some things. So here we are," Nappi said during today's press conference. "We've learned that our helium system is not performing, albeit manageable. It's still working like we had designed it. So, we got to go figure that out."

Nappi emphasized that the performance of most of the RCS thrusters is good, trending toward nominal, while the helium leaks "show that they're stable and less than measured [before]." The team is working to learn more about Starliner while the service module, which provides most of the spacecraft's fuel and power, is still attached to the spacecraft, as it will be discarded just before landing.

"This is an opportunity to fully understand the system's performance and without the pressure of schedule or time," Nappi said. Aside from the technical issues, the mission has satisfied 77 of the original 87 flight test objectives, he noted; the remaining 10 will be evaluated during undocking and landing.

Related: NASA weighs potential impacts of helium leaks and more on Boeing's Starliner astronaut test flight

Starliner, along with SpaceX's Dragon capsule, are tasked by NASA to send agency-led crews to the ISS from American soil. (Russia also leads and launches cosmonaut-led crews on its long-running Soyuz spacecraft.) CFT aims to certify Starliner for the first operational ISS rotation mission, called Starliner-1, expected to launch in 2025.

Dragon and Starliner were first tasked in 2014 to send NASA astronauts aloft by 2017, but funding and technical issues extended the timeline by several years. SpaceX, whose Crew Dragon spacecraft is based on the company's ISS cargo capsule, launched its first astronaut test mission in 2020 following just one uncrewed test flight. Starliner's first human mission came four years after that and required two uncrewed tests, in part because the spacecraft is a new design.

Starliner's path to CFT was delayed after the capsule experienced problems on its first uncrewed test mission in December 2019 and failed to reach the ISS as planned. (Astronauts often say, however, that in developmental programs such as Starliner, timelines are difficult to estimate as the unexpected can always arise.)

Boeing addressed those glitches, which took time. The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic in early 2020 delayed the launch of the second uncrewed ISS mission further, pushing it into May 2022. CFT was next expected to launch in 2023, but that flight was delayed after issues with parachute loading and flammable tape were uncovered last year.

CFT then underwent two scrubs on the pad due to issues with the Atlas V and ground equipment. The first, on May 6, occurred roughly two hours before launch due to a "buzzing valve" that required rolling back to a company facility for replacement. The second launch attempt on June 1 was scrubbed due to an issue with a ground launch sequencer less than four minutes before liftoff.

Read the original post:

NASA, Boeing delay Starliner astronaut landing to June 26 amid thruster issues - Space.com

Here’s How Much Spaceflight Changes the Body’s Biology in Just Three Days – Singularity Hub

Hayley Arceneaux is hardly the picture of a traditional astronaut. The 32-year-old physician assistant has a metal rod inserted into her leg to replace cancerous bone segments removed in a brawl with the disease as a child.

But in September 2021, she became the youngest American civilian to orbit the Earth as a member of SpaceXs Inspiration4 mission. Led by billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman, the trip was the first to carry an all-civilian crew of four people to space and opened a unique opportunity to investigate how spaceflight changes our bodies and mindsnot for trained astronauts, but for everyday people. The crew agreed to have biological samples taken before, during, and after the three-day flight. They also tested their cognition throughout the trip.

In over 40 studies released last week, researchers found that radiation and low gravity rapidly changed the bodys inner workings. After just three days, the immune system and gene expression were out of whack, and cloudy thinking set in.

The good news? Upon returning to Earth, most of these troubles eased.

Together, the package of data is the largest to date detailing spaceflights impact on the body. This is the beginning of precision medicine for spaceflight, Christopher Mason at Weill Cornell Medicine, who co-authored some of the papers, told Nature. This is the biggest release of biomedical data from astronauts, he added when speaking to Science.

All the data acquired from the crew during and after their mission is publicly available in NASAs Open Science Data Repository.

Were in a new space race, with multiple countries sprinting to revisit the moon and beyond. At the same time, commercial spaceflight for those eager to see Earth-rise and experience the mind-boggling effects of zero gravity is becoming more common.

From NASA studies, we already know spaceflight changes the body. For the past six decades, NASA has carefully characterized impacts such as increased long-term cancer risks from radiation exposure, changes in vision, and muscle and bone wasting. Comparative data from twin astronauts Scott and Mark Kellywith one twin on Earth and the other in orbitfound more specific biological changes relating to spaceflight.

However, most studies follow highly-trained astronauts. They often have a military background and are in tip-top physical shape. Their missions can last months in zero-gravityobviously far longer than a three-day jaunt.

To make spaceflight available to the rest of us, analyzing biological changes in civilian astronauts could better represent how our bodies react to space. Enter Inspiration4. The lead sponsor, Isaacman, recruited three everyday people to go on the first commercial trip to orbit the Earth. Arceneaux and Isaacman were joined by Sian Proctor, a lecturer who teaches geoscience, and an engineer, Christopher Sembroski. Their ages ranged from 29 to 51 years old.

The crew agreed to take blood, saliva, urine, and feces samples during their three days in space. They also wore fitness trackers and took cognitive tests. All this information was processed and added to the Space Omics and Medical Atlas (SOMA). The database includes the volunteers genomes, gene expression, and an atlas of proteins that make up and control bodily functions.

Inspiration4 orbited Earth at a much higher altitude than the International Space Station, where astronauts usually reside, so the new dataset captured biological changes on short-term, high-altitude missions with samples from a wider range of demographics. Up to 40 percent of the findings are new, Mason told Science.

Surprisingly, the samples reflected bodily changes that have previously only been seen on long-term spaceflights. The most prominent was an increase in telomere lengththe protective end caps that keeps our genetic code intact. When cells replicate, these protective caps erodea biological signature thats often associated with aging.

However, during Kellys year in space, his telomeres actually grew longer, suggesting that in a way his cells were made biologically youngernot necessary a win, as abnormally long telomeres have been linked to cancer risk. Once he returned to Earth, however, his telomeres returned to their normal length.

Like Kelly, the Inspiration4 crew also experienced a sudden lengthening and shortening of their telomeres, despite only three days in space, suggesting fast-acting biological changes. Digging deeper, one research team found that RNAthe messenger molecule that helps translate DNA into proteinswas rapidly altered in the crew, similar to changes observed in people climbing Mount Everestanother extreme scenario where there is gravity, but limited oxygen and increased radiation.

To study author Susan Bailey at Colorado State University, the cause of telomere lengthening may not be weightlessness per se; rather, its likely due to radiation at high altitudes and in space.

Another study found that space stressed the crews immune system at the gene expression level in a group of white blood cellsthose that tackle infections and cancers. Some parts of the immune system seemed to be on high alert; but the stress of spaceflight also affected genes that battle infections, suggesting a decreased ability to fight off viruses and pathogens. Using multi-omics data, the team found a spaceflight signature of gene expression related to immune system function.

The crew also showed signs of cosmic kidney disease. Molecular signals highlighted a potential increased risk for kidney stones. While not a problem for a three-day flight, for a longer missionsay, to the moon or Marskidney problems could rapidly escalate into a medical crisis.

The civilian astronauts cognition also faltered. Using iPads, the crew tackled a slew of mental tasks. These included, for example, the ability to focus and maintain attention in several standardized tests or to press a button when a stopwatch suddenly popped onto a screen. Within three days, their performance declined compared to when they were on the ground.

Our speed response was slowerthat surprised me, Arceneaux told the New York Times. However, rather than reflecting cognitive problems due to space travel, it could also be because the crew were distracted by the sight of Earth right out the window.

With data from just four people, its hard to draw conclusions. Most tissue samples were compared to previous data from NASA astronauts or the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. That said, when you see the same protein or genetic signatures changing across different missions and people, thats when you start believing it, co-author Afshin Beheshti at the Blue Marble Space Institute of Science told Nature.

All the data was gathered into the SOMA database for other scientists to explore, and tissue samples were stored in a biobank. As commercial spaceflights become more common, scientists may have the opportunity to collect data before, during, and after a mission to further grasp what traveling beyond Earth means for the rest of us. For example, are there any triggers for severe motion sickness while being shot into space?

These insights could also give us time to develop potential treatments to ward off the negative effects of spaceflight for longer trips across the solar system.

Inspiration4 was just the first commercial sprint into space. Several other missions are on the books, including Polaris Dawn, which is set to launch as early as next monthwith the goal of attempting the first commercial spacewalk.

Soon well have more data from multiple missions and multiple crews. Im optimistic about the future, said study author Mason.

As for Arceneaux, since landing back on Earth shes continued her work as a physician assistant at St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital. Remembering her view from orbit, she told The New York Times, We are all one on this beautiful planet.

Image Credit: Inspiration4 crew in orbit / Inspiration4

Link:

Here's How Much Spaceflight Changes the Body's Biology in Just Three Days - Singularity Hub

Isar Aerospace Extends Series C Funding Round to 220M – European Spaceflight

Credit: Isar

German rocket builder Isar Aerospace has announced that it has extended its Series C funding round by more than 65 million, bringing its total funding to over 400 million.

Isar was founded in 2018 and is developing its two-stage Spectrum rocket, which it is currently preparing to debut from the recently inaugurated Andya Spaceport in Norway. Once operational, the 28-metre rocket will be capable of delivering payloads of up to 1,000 kilograms to low Earth orbit.

The company originally closed its Series C funding round in March 2023, securing $165 million (155 million). On 20 June, Isar announced that it had extended its Series C funding round, which now totals more than 220 million. The funding round extension received significant involvement from the NATO Innovation Fund (NIF), a venture capital fund backed by 24 NATO allies focused on addressing challenges in defence, security, and resilience.

The investment by the NATO Innovation Fund in Isar Aerospace is a strong sign of confidence in our approach and underlines the fundamental role of space technologies for our economies and societies, explained Isar CEO Daniel Metzler in a statement. Even more, it shows that European governments need to promote and leverage private innovation and products to keep up globally.

In addition to NIF, the funding round included contributions from G3T, 10x Group, Besant Capital, Finadvice Med HOLDINGS, LP&E, and existing investors Lakestar, Earlybird, Airbus Ventures, Bayern Kapital, and UVC Partners.

According to Isar, the new funding will enable the company to continue investing in the build-up and equipment for its series production.

In May, Isar signed a contract with commercial real estate developer VGP Group to build its new headquarters on a 40,000-square-metre plot in an industrial park near Munich. The company has stated that the new facility will be the worlds most modern production facility for orbital launch vehicles. Once fully operational, the facility will have the capacity to produce up to 40 Spectrum rockets per year.

Read more here:

Isar Aerospace Extends Series C Funding Round to 220M - European Spaceflight

China selects 4th batch of astronaut candidates as part of 2030 moon landing goal – Space.com

China has selected 10 new astronauts for training as part of its goal to put a crew on the moon by 2030, the country's human spaceflight agency announced last week.

The latest batch includes eight pilots and two payload experts, according to the China Manned Space Engineering Office (CMSEO). They are set to receive about two years of training at the Astronaut Center of China (ACC) in Beijing, after which they will become eligible for crewed missions to the Tiangong space station in low Earth orbit.

The newly selected astronaut candidates will be tasked with conducting science experiments inside the Tiangong station and also "fulfilling the nation's manned missions to the moon," Huang Weifen, chief trainer of the astronauts, told the state-run outlet China Daily.

While all 39 of China's previously selected astronauts were former air force pilots, the latest batch for the first time includes pilots from the ground force and navy wings of the People's Liberation Army (PLA). The newly selected 10 were picked from a pool of 120 applicants following three rounds of tests related to physical and psychological skills, according to China Daily.

The two payload specialists, one each from Hong Kong and Macao, marked the first time astronauts were selected from the two "special administrative regions" (SARs). Hong Kong media reported the expert from the city to be Lai Ka-ying, a chief inspector with the Hong Kong Police who worked in the force's secret technical services division. John Lee Ka-chiu, who is the Current Chief Executive of Hong Kong, said Ka-ying's selection "writes [a] glorious history for [Hong Kong] and makes the whole of Hong Kong proud," according to the Hong Kong Free Press.

The details of the second payload expert, who's from Macao, were not made public. "It is an honor for [Macao] and sends a strong message of encouragement to Macao young people," a statement by the Macao government read.

Details of the remaining eight crew members were not revealed, as is the protocol of the China Manned Space Agency (CMSA). For example, the agency tends to announce the identities of astronauts flying to Tiangong only a day before launch.

Sign up to our newsletter for the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

The news comes shortly after the launch of the three-person Shenzhou 18 mission to Tiangong, including China's first civilian astronaut. The three astronauts Ye Guangfu, Li Cong and Li Guangsu recently completed strength tests using the station's bicycle and treadmill, data from which will guide the exercise plan to minimize muscle loss in the microgravity environment, CSMA said on Monday (June 17).

The agency added that the newly selected astronauts are among those who may set foot on the moon by 2030. In February, Ji Qiming, assistant to the director of CMSA, told local media that the technical proposal for the launch and lunar landing site, and the development of the Long March 10 rocket, Mengzhou crew spacecraft, Lanyue lander and spacesuits were ready.

Original post:

China selects 4th batch of astronaut candidates as part of 2030 moon landing goal - Space.com

NASA says Boeing Starliner spacecraft return delayed to June 26 – The Washington Post

Boeings Starliner spacecraft, which was supposed to remain docked to the International Space Station for about a week, is getting some extra time in space, NASA said Tuesday, as officials troubleshoot helium leaks and study why some thrusters failed during the test flight.

The capsule is now scheduled to fly a pair of NASA astronauts, Suni Williams and Barry Butch Wilmore, back to Earth and land in the New Mexico desert at 4:51 a.m. Eastern time June 26, which would mark a 20-day mission. The return leg, with a fiery plunge through the atmosphere, is a key part of the test flight that will stress the spacecrafts heat shield with temperatures reaching about 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Officials will also be examining whether the parachute system, which Boeing had to redesign after an earlier test flight without anyone on board, provides a safe landing in what would be the final act of Starliners first flight with humans on board.

After delays caused by a faulty valve on the rocket and helium leaks in the spacecraft, Starliner launched from Cape Canaveral, Fla. on June 5 and reached the station a day later. As Starliner approached the station, five of its thrusters, used to make small adjustments to its trajectory, went offline, forcing Boeing to back the vehicle away from the station and troubleshoot the issue.

NASA and Boeing were able to bring four of the five back online and dock successfully.

The teams test fired the thrusters on Saturday while the spacecraft was attached to the station, and all of them worked well, NASA said. They did not try to test fire the one thruster that didnt come back online during the flight and wont try to use it during Starliners return flight out of an abundance of caution, Steve Stich, NASAs commercial crew program manager, said during a briefing Tuesday.

In addition to the thruster problems, Starliner has suffered a series of helium leaks in its propulsion system. NASA and Boeing discovered a new one the fifth since Starliner has been on the station. That leak is small and wont pose a problem for the return, NASA said. Helium is used to pressurize the propellants through the propulsion system.

Stories to keep you informed

NASA originally said Starliner would come home June 18, then pushed the landing back to June 22. The thruster problems and helium leaks are contained in the spacecrafts service module, which is used to maneuver the capsule during flight. Before the capsule reenters Earths atmosphere, the service module is jettisoned and burns up. That means engineers wont be able to study it after the flight, which is one of the reasons they said they were taking more time to understand the issues now.

Were taking our extra time given that this is a crewed vehicle, and we want to make sure that we havent left any stone unturned, Stich said. We also want to look at the systems, and potential interaction between the systems, and make sure we havent missed something before we return. And were getting a lot of great data while were at the space station for not only this flight but for the next flight.

NASA and Boeing think the thrusters went offline because of the extreme heat generated while they were firing in rapid succession to keep the capsule on course with the space station, Stich said.

In some cases, we think the heating may have caused the propellants to vaporize a little bit and we didnt get good mixing [of the propellants], and thats why the thrust was a little bit lower, he said. Engineers still dont understand what is causing the helium leaks, he said.

While on the station, Williams and Wilmore have prepared for their return, as well as rehearsed using Starliner as a safe haven in the event of an emergency on the space station. Theyve also worked alongside the other astronauts installing research equipment, maintaining the labs hardware, and helping station crew members Matt Dominick and Tracy Dyson prepare for a spacewalk, NASA said in a statement.

Despite the problems, NASA expressed confidence in Starliner. Officials said they expected to discover issues during the mission, a test flight designed to see how Starliner operates with humans on board.

Weve always said this as a test flight and were going to learn some things, said Mark Nappi, a Boeing vice president who oversees the Starliner program. So here we are. Weve learned that our helium system is not performing as designed, albeit manageable. So weve got to go figure that out.

Once the mission is complete, NASA would certify Starliner for regular crew rotation flights of a full contingent of four astronauts to the space station. SpaceX, the other participant in NASAs commercial crew program, which outsourced human spaceflight to the private sector after the space shuttle was retired, has been flying astronauts for NASA since 2020.

Given the problems Starliner has faced on this test flight, its not clear when Boeing, which was awarded a $4.2 billion NASA contract in 2014, would fly its first regular crew rotation mission.

Weve got to go address the helium leaks, Stich said. Were not going to go fly another mission like this with the helium leaks. The teams also need to find out whats causing the thrusters to have low thrust, he added. So weve got some of that work to do after this flight.

See more here:

NASA says Boeing Starliner spacecraft return delayed to June 26 - The Washington Post

Boeing’s Starliner Stuck at Space Station: Unraveling Helium Leaks and Thruster Troubles – SciTechDaily

The Starliner spacecraft on NASAs Boeing Crew Flight Test is pictured docked to the Harmony modules forward port as the International Space Station orbited 263 miles above the Mediterranean Sea. Credit: NASA

Boeings Starliner spacecraft is stuck at the Space Station for now as NASA and Boeing have adjusted the return schedule to address issues within the propulsion system while managing conflicts with planned spacewalks at the International Space Station.

This delay allows for comprehensive reviews and system checks, paralleling procedures from previous missions. While these evaluations occur, astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams remain active aboard the ISS, equipped with ample supplies and no pressing need to return to Earth soon.

Leadership at NASA and Boeing have again adjusted the return to Earth of the Starliner Crew Flight Test spacecraft with agency astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams from the International Space Station (ISS). The move off Wednesday, June 26, deconflicts Starliners undocking and landing from a series of planned International Space Station spacewalks while allowing mission teams time to review propulsion system data. Listen to a full replay (embedded below) of the June 18 media briefing where NASA and Boeing leadership discussed the ongoing efforts.

We are taking our time and following our standard mission management team process, said Steve Stich, manager of NASAs Commercial Crew Program. We are letting the data drive our decision-making relative to managing the small helium system leaks and thruster performance we observed during rendezvous and docking. Additionally, given the duration of the mission, it is appropriate for us to complete an agency-level review, similar to what was done ahead of the NASAs SpaceX Demo-2 return after two months on orbit, to document the agencys formal acceptance on proceeding as planned.

A media telecon with mission leadership will follow the readiness reviews conclusion, and the agency will share those details as they are solidified. Boeings Starliner spacecraft remains cleared for return in case of an emergency on the space station that required the crew to leave orbit and come back to Earth.

Mission managers are evaluating future return opportunities following the stations two planned spacewalks on Monday, June 24, and Tuesday, July 2.

An aurora streams below Boeings Starliner spacecraft docked to the forward port on the Harmony module as the International Space Station soared 266 miles above the Indian Ocean southwest of Australia. Credit: NASA

Starliner is performing well in orbit while docked to the space station, said Stich. We are strategically using the extra time to clear a path for some critical station activities while completing readiness for Butch and Sunis return on Starliner and gaining valuable insight into the system upgrades we will want to make for post-certification missions.

NASAs Boeing Crew Flight Test astronauts (from top) Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams pose for a portrait inside the vestibule between the forward port on the International Space Stations Harmony module and Boeings Starliner spacecraft. Credit: NASA

Wilmore and Williams remain integrated with the Expedition 71 crew, assisting with station operations as needed and completing add-on in-flight objectives for NASA certification of Starliner.

The crews feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, and they know that every bit of learning we do on the Crew Flight Test will improve and sharpen our experience for future crews, said Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager, Boeings Starliner Program.

The crew is not pressed for time to leave the station since there are plenty of supplies in orbit, and the stations schedule is relatively open through mid-August.

Here is the original post:

Boeing's Starliner Stuck at Space Station: Unraveling Helium Leaks and Thruster Troubles - SciTechDaily

Researchers investigate impacts of space travel on eye health – Tech Explorist

As the frequency of space travel increases, its crucial to understand the effects of altered gravity on the human body. Dr. Ana Diaz Artiles and her team at Texas A&M University are investigating the impact of space flight on eye health, particularly the consequences of gravitational changes.

During space travel, shifts in bodily fluids due to altered gravity can affect the cardiovascular system, potentially leading to changes in the vessels around the eyes.

As space travel becomes more accessible to individuals outside of traditional astronaut training, such as commercial space travelers, its essential to recognize the potential impact on cardiovascular and eye health, especially for those who may not have the same level of physical fitness as professional astronauts.

When we experience microgravity conditions, we see changes in the cardiovascular system because gravity is not pulling down all these fluids as it typically does on Earth when we are in an upright position, said Diaz Artiles, an assistant professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and a Williams Brothers Construction Company Faculty Fellow. When were upright, a large part of our fluids are stored in our legs, but in microgravity, we get a redistribution of fluids into the upper body.

The intriguing phenomenon of Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS) has drawn significant attention due to its impact on astronauts eye health during space missions. Researchers, led by Diaz Artiles, are unraveling the underlying mechanisms of SANS in hopes of developing effective countermeasures.

A recent study explored the potential of lower body negative pressure (LBNP) as a promising intervention to mitigate the adverse effects of microgravity-induced fluid shifts. This research holds promise for ensuring astronauts ocular health and overall well-being during prolonged space missions.

While the exact role of ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in the development of Spaceflight-associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS) is still uncertain, Diaz Artiles and her team have suggested that exposure to microgravity might result in a slight but persistent increase in OPP compared to upright postures, potentially contributing to the development of SANS.

However, their recently published study found that lower body negative pressure (LBNP), while successful in shifting fluid towards the lower body, did not effectively reduce OPP. If elevated OPP is indeed linked to SANS, it suggests that LBNP may not be an effective countermeasure for this syndrome. The team underscores the need for future research to better understand the relationship between OPP and SANS, as well as the impact of LBNP on these ocular responses, for the development of effective countermeasures.

This research is just one experiment of a three-part study to better understand the effects of fluid shift in the body and its relationship to SANS. Previous experiments in this study included the use of a tilt table for researchers to understand the cardiovascular effects of fluid shifts at different altered gravity levels, recreated by using different tilt angles, said Diaz Artiles.

The current study and ongoing research are dedicated to developing effective countermeasures for the fluid shift phenomenon, primarily focusing on lower body negative pressure. In the near future, the researchers plan to assess the effectiveness of using a centrifuge to address the fluid shift and its associated effects.

Diaz Artiles and her team are determined to gather comprehensive data on cardiovascular responses to each countermeasure and compare their impact on ocular perfusion pressure and other crucial cardiovascular functions affected by microgravity environments. As these studies are conducted on Earth, the researchers anticipate that gravitational variations in space may yield different results. As a result, they are eager to conduct future studies in true microgravity conditions, such as parabolic flights.

Journal reference:

Continued here:

Researchers investigate impacts of space travel on eye health - Tech Explorist